Dr. John Lott talked to One America Information about his latest op-ed piece in The Federalist titled “No, Gun Management Wouldn’t Have Prevented The Newest Trump Assassination Try.”
.
From One America Information:
.
On this interview, One America’s John Hines speaks with Dr. John Lott, founder and president of the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart, concerning the renewed nationwide debate over gun management following the assault on the White Home Correspondents’ Dinner.
Dr. Lott argues that proposed new gun management measures wouldn’t have prevented the incident, pointing to California’s current restrictions—together with common background checks and an assault weapons ban—as proof that strict legal guidelines don’t essentially cease violent assaults. He additionally discusses broader tendencies in crime knowledge and challenges claims made by gun management advocacy teams.
The dialog additional explores arguments surrounding federal gun coverage, proposed registries, and differing interpretations of how efficient present and proposed legal guidelines are in decreasing gun violence.
John Hines, “California Gun Legal guidelines Beneath Scrutiny After White Home Correspondents Dinner Assault,” YouTube, Might 5, 2026.
