Sheikh Hasina, the previous Prime Minister of Bangladesh, has issued a vehement critique of the interim authorities led by Muhammad Yunus amid ongoing unrest within the nation. Talking in an unique electronic mail interview with ANI, she asserted that Yunus possesses “no mandate to realign Bangladesh’s overseas coverage.”
This assertion comes within the wake of the loss of life of a outstanding youth motion chief related together with her ouster, which has intensified political tensions.
Hasina warned that strategic choices by an unelected administration may yield long-term repercussions for Bangladesh. She emphasised that after free elections resume, the nation’s overseas coverage would revert to prioritising nationwide pursuits over “ideological fantasies of extremists who’ve quickly seized energy.”
She underscored the enduring bond between Bangladesh and India, declaring it “elementary” and resilient past the interim regime’s tenure.
The ex-leader dismissed the latest Worldwide Crimes Tribunal (ICT) verdict in opposition to her as a “political assassination in judicial robes.” She rejected claims of institutional erosion, insisting she was denied correct defence rights and legal professionals of her selection. Hasina described the tribunal as a device for a “witch hunt” in opposition to the Awami League, sustaining unwavering religion in Bangladesh’s constitutional traditions.
She predicted that true justice would emerge upon restoration of respectable governance and judicial independence. Concerning the February elections, Hasina challenged their legitimacy with out the Awami League, which faces a ban. “An election with out the Awami League isn’t an election, however a coronation,” she said, highlighting Yunus’s governance with out in style votes whereas looking for to suppress a celebration elected 9 instances.
Hasina cautioned {that a} continued ban would disenfranchise tens of millions, resulting in voter abstention and a authorities devoid of ethical authority. She labelled the present trajectory a “horrible missed alternative” for nationwide reconciliation, reaffirming her lifelong dedication to Bangladesh’s safety. On extradition calls for post-ICT ruling, she attributed them to a “determined” Yunus administration, assured in acquittal by an neutral court docket like The Hague.
Expressing gratitude to India for its hospitality and cross-party help, Hasina clarified her departure aimed to avert bloodshed, not evade justice. She reiterated her readiness to return underneath a respectable authorities with an unbiased judiciary. Addressing strained India-Bangladesh ties, together with Dhaka’s summons of the Indian envoy, she blamed Yunus completely for issuing “hostile statements” and failing to defend minorities or curb extremist overseas coverage affect.
Hasina praised India’s decades-long function as Bangladesh’s steadfast companion, anticipating a return to their “wise partnership” post-democracy.
She attributed rising anti-India sentiment and diplomat security issues to extremists emboldened by Yunus, citing assaults on the Indian embassy, media, and minorities by the identical forces that displaced her household. A accountable authorities, she argued, would safeguard diplomatic missions quite than defend perpetrators.
The killing of Sharif Usman Hadi exemplifies the lawlessness that toppled her administration and has worsened underneath Yunus, normalising violence and eroding inside stability alongside neighbourly relations. “Once you can’t keep primary order inside your borders, your credibility on the worldwide stage collapses,” she remarked, encapsulating “the truth of Yunus’s Bangladesh.”
Hasina voiced alarm over Islamist affect, echoing her son’s issues and people of tens of millions favouring a secular state. She accused Yunus of appointing extremists to cupboard roles, releasing terrorists, and allowing terror-linked teams into public spheres. Radicals, she claimed, exploit Yunus as an internationally palatable facade whereas infiltrating establishments, posing dangers to South Asian stability past India.
Rhetoric from Bangladeshi leaders invoking the “Hen’s Neck” or Siliguri Hall drew her condemnation as “harmful and irresponsible,” unfit for leaders reliant on India for commerce and transit.Â
Such voices, she insisted, misrepresent Bangladeshis, with reckless discuss ceasing underneath restored democracy. On burgeoning Pakistan-Bangladesh ties, Hasina advocated “friendship to all, malice towards none” however critiqued Yunus’s “headlong embrace” of Islamabad as desperation-driven, misaligned with nationwide pursuits after alienating allies.
This interview reveals Hasina’s unyielding stance in opposition to the interim setup, positioning her as a defender of democratic norms, secularism, and longstanding India ties. Her phrases sign persistent Awami League resilience regardless of bans, amid Bangladesh’s risky transition towards elections.
Primarily based On ANI Report
