That is The Marshall Mission’s Closing Argument publication, a weekly deep dive right into a key felony justice challenge. Need this delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to future newsletters. That is our one centesimal essay since re-launching the weekly Closing Argument publication in 2022. Because of everybody who reads every week!
On Wednesday, Marcellus Williams will lastly have a listening to on his innocence claims. The 55-year-old demise row prisoner was convicted within the 1998 homicide of Felicia Gayle throughout a theft of her suburban St. Louis dwelling. It comes not a second too quickly for Williams, who Missouri plans to place to demise in September.
It’s not the primary time he has confronted such a deadline. In 2017, Williams was hours away from execution when the governor granted him a reprieve so a panel may consider his innocence claims, together with DNA testing that wasn’t obtainable on the time of the crime. The testing excluded Williams because the supply of DNA discovered on the homicide weapon, in line with his attorneys. Final 12 months, a brand new governor disbanded the panel with out releasing its findings.
Quite a bit modified between 2017 and 2023. In 2021, the Missouri legislature handed a regulation that enables native prosecutors to file a movement to throw out convictions of people that they imagine to be harmless. Longtime St. Louis County prosecutor Bob McCulloch — who believed fervently in Williams’ guilt — was additionally changed by Wesley Bell, who ordered a overview of the case and was troubled by what he discovered. Bell cited “clear and convincing proof” of Williams’ innocence in a movement to vacate the conviction, a transfer made potential by the 2021 regulation.
Missouri Legal professional Normal Andrew Bailey will oppose Williams’ launch on the listening to on Wednesday, one thing he’s had loads of follow at this summer time. He additionally battled St. Louis Circuit Legal professional Gabe Gore over the innocence case of Chris Dunn, who spent 34 years in jail after being convicted of a 1990 St. Louis homicide. The 2 eyewitnesses connecting him to the crime — who had been each underneath the age of 15 on the time — have since recanted.
Just like Williams’ case, Gore filed a movement to toss Dunn’s conviction underneath the 2021 state regulation. Decide Jason Sengheiser agreed with Gore’s view of the case earlier this summer time, concluding that “in gentle of recent proof, no juror, appearing fairly, would have voted to search out Dunn responsible,” and ordered Dunn’s launch.
Dunn was on the brink of stroll out of jail late final month when a problem from Bailey stopped his launch. As Dunn’s spouse put it to The Washington Submit, “He was actually 50 toes from freedom.” Dunn needed to wait one other week till the state supreme courtroom dominated that Bailey didn’t have the authority to carry him.
Bailey additionally fought to maintain Sandra Hemme in jail this summer time after the courts overturned her homicide conviction, 43 years right into a life sentence. There was no proof linking Hemme to the crime except for a confession that she supplied whereas closely sedated and in a “malleable psychological state,” in line with the decide who reviewed and tossed her conviction.
Bailey argued that Hemme ought to stay in jail to start serving two sentences for convictions she acquired whereas incarcerated — together with a 10-year sentence for attacking a jail employee with a razor blade in 1996 — an argument the state supreme courtroom rejected.
Authorized observers have expressed some shock and dismay at simply how aggressive Bailey has been in opposing wrongful conviction and innocence claims. In a number of instances, he has opened himself and different state officers to contempt of courtroom costs in his efforts to maintain individuals detained after a decide had ordered them launched. However it’s not unusual for prosecutors to take a inflexible posture within the face of innocence claims. In a 2015 examine of wrongful convictions, Jon Gould and Richard Leo discovered that police and prosecutors had been the biggest sources of opposition to exonerations.
The same state of affairs is enjoying out in Erie County, New York. Final summer time, a decide threw out Brian Scott Lorenz’ conviction for a 1993 homicide. Prosecutors have succeeded in protecting him in jail — the place he’s been for the final 30 years — whereas they enchantment the ruling.
Taking a look at exonerations from demise row, an evaluation this week from the Demise Penalty Info Heart discovered that wrongful convictions often happen due to a number of causes, together with official misconduct, mistaken witness identification, false confession, and false or deceptive forensic proof.
In Texas, a regulation handed in 2013 was supposed to assist create a pathway for aid in wrongful convictions influenced by dangerous forensic science. The statute, dubbed the “junk science regulation” has not led to a single new trial for a demise row prisoner since its passage nevertheless, and felony protection advocates just like the nonprofit Texas Defender Service have stated it’s not fulfilling its supposed objective.
Legal professionals for Robert Roberson — who my colleague Maurice Chammah wrote about final 12 months — say that his case should be the right check for the regulation. Roberson was convicted within the 2003 demise of his 2-year-old daughter underneath the speculation that she died of “shaken child syndrome,” which has since confronted medical and authorized scrutiny.
Roberson is scheduled for execution in October.
