SPP Negotiations Stall: Why the Science-Policy Panel for Chemicals and Waste Must Get It Right – Center for International Environmental Law

Printed June 6, 2025

By Rachel Radvany, Environmental Well being Campaigner on the Middle for Worldwide Environmental Legislation. 

Preparations are nonetheless ongoing for the institution of a Science-Coverage Panel on chemical substances, waste, and air pollution prevention. After every week of negotiations in June 2024 in Geneva — the third of three scheduled Open-Ended Working Teams (OEWG 3) — which have been meant to finalize the Panel, international locations failed to achieve an settlement. Whereas a lot of OEWG 3 occurred behind closed doorways, the identical delay ways which have dominated different multilateral environmental areas have been on full show all through the week. 

OEWG 3 in Geneva targeted on finalizing foundational paperwork, such because the institutional preparations that will articulate the Panel’s and the way it will function, together with key ideas to information its work and easy methods to safeguard the panel from conflicts of curiosity. Nevertheless, Member States weren’t capable of make enough progress, so the OEWG was prolonged into a further assembly. The draft textual content has been deferred to the following assembly (OEWG 3.2), which can happen from June 15-18 in Punta del Este, Uruguay. An intergovernmental assembly can also be scheduled for adoption of the textual content back-to-back with the OEWG assembly, on June 19-20. 

The OEWG, fashioned underneath UNEA decision 5/8, was tasked with establishing the Panel. Many have known as the longer term Panel the “third triplet” to the Intergovernmental Panel on Local weather Change (IPCC) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Companies (IPBES). The Panel would supply features akin to horizon scanning to establish rising points, conduct assessments of present points and establish potential options, facilitate information-sharing and communication, and capability constructing to strengthen the science-policy interface. Key to notice is the Panel might be a non-legally binding scientific physique, with outcomes which might be “policy-relevant however not coverage prescriptive,” not designed to undertake danger or hazard assessments of particular chemical substances. 

Conflicts of Curiosity

The chemical substances business has a observe document of omission and manipulation of science, making it vital for the Science-Coverage Panel’s credibility to have safeguards in opposition to conflicts of curiosity. The discussions in Geneva surfaced differing views on particulars — like which potential conflicts must be disclosed and easy methods to decide whether or not they’re “important and related.” Such selections must be left to an neutral committee, and previous conflicts should be disclosed to keep away from business bias influencing the Panel’s work. 

The assembly in Geneva really useful that the battle of curiosity coverage might be finalized after the Panel is about up. However to safeguard the integrity of the Panel’s work from vested pursuits looking for to delay regulation — a tactic widespread within the wider world of chemical substances and waste coverage — this coverage should be in place earlier than the Panel begins its work. 

Participation

Participation of non-governmental observers is a key means to make sure transparency and credibility. With out it, the Panel’s work dangers being questioned and its legitimacy undermined. 

Participation of observers will enrich the work of the panel, by offering experience that governments could not have entry to. There are numerous totally different areas of experience which might be related to the Panel’s work — together with however not restricted to tutorial science, Indigenous information, citizen science, and the well being sector — and these will solely serve to raised inform the work of the Panel and guarantee its outcomes are sturdy. The Panel’s mandate explicitly states the necessity for “inclusive participation, together with indigenous peoples,” and Member States should make sure that these views are acknowledged and guarded throughout the textual content. 

There may be precedent in all different multilateral chemical substances and waste areas for sturdy observer participation, who contribute to the work, just like the POPs Evaluate Committee underneath the Stockholm Conference. 

Politicization of the Negotiations

This negotiation suffered from the rising and ongoing makes an attempt to politicize worldwide environmental multilateralism. All through the course of the assembly, some international locations used numerous delay ways to dam progress on agreeing on the Panel’s textual content. A few of these ways included elevating procedural factors and persevering with to take action even after the query was answered, or refusing to interact till one nation’s calls for have been met. 

One key tactic was pushing “consensus” because the decision-making commonplace within the Panel, which might introduce de facto veto energy that any nation might use to delay progress on the Panel’s work. This isn’t a brand new effort — we’ve seen comparable pushes within the Plastics Treaty negotiations — however quite a continued effort to remake multilateralism as an entire. Within the particular context of the SPP, one other regarding second was the obvious confusion concerning the function of science and the way science works. The repeated assertion: “Science can’t be negotiated, because of this we want consensus” — a cynical twist that appears geared toward manufacturing doubt and delaying coverage motion. 

Politics additionally surfaced across the concept of making a joint secretariat between the UN Surroundings Programme (UNEP) and the World Well being Group (WHO) — an concept many international locations welcomed. Chemical substances, waste, and air pollution are intricately linked to well being, and the WHO’s well being experience could be essential to the Panel’s mission. Nevertheless, sure international locations opposed it, more likely to restrict WHO’s function and the Panel’s total effectiveness. 

The failure to achieve settlement in Geneva in 2024 was disappointing given the years of labor which have gone into establishing this Panel. However, finalizing the foundational paperwork at OEWG3 would have meant compromising on key parts akin to battle of curiosity and observers’ participation with a purpose to attain an settlement. Provided that this Panel has the potential to form world work on chemical substances and waste for many years to come back, it’s higher to take a bit extra time to get the set-up proper, and make sure that all the correct parts are included. 

The resumed OEWG 3 in Uruguay will deal with finalizing the paperwork to ascertain the Panel (together with the foundational paperwork) and the principles of process. The dialogue might be clustered into three subjects: 

Membership and features of the Panel and its our bodies, and decision-making; 
Foundational parts associated to the principles of process and the draft resolution to ascertain the Panel; 
Different guidelines of process, the draft resolution to ahead the principles, insurance policies, and procedures to the governing physique, and preparations for the interim interval earlier than the primary Panel assembly. 

This Panel has the potential to develop into a cornerstone of world chemical substances and waste governance— whether it is constructed on transparency, independence, and inclusivity. CIEL and companions will proceed to observe these negotiations and assist Member States in finalizing a Science-Coverage Panel that may adequately contribute to the prevention of air pollution and defend folks and the planet.