Why Leaving the Ice Early Cost Kyiv Capitals at CAS – Field of Play Doctrine Prevails

A lately revealed Arbitral Award by the Court docket of Arbitration for Sport confirmed a call of the Disciplinary Committee of the Ice Hockey Federation of Ukraine in opposition to Hockey Membership Kyiv Capitals (Kyiv Capitals). The attraction to the CAS had been introduced by Kyiv Capitals in reference to a match throughout the 2023/2024 Ukrainian Males’s Ice Hockey Championship season.

This text examines the award which serves as an important reminder for golf equipment, athletes, and sports activities directors concerning the penalties of abandoning matches in protest at refereeing choices. The ruling has broader implications for all sports activities organizations in understanding when regulatory sanctions for match abandonment shall be upheld by sports activities tribunals.

The complete award is on the market right here: CAS 2024/A/10449 Hockey Membership Kyiv Capitals v. Ice Hockey Federation of Ukraine[1]

Article Define

Factual background
Procedural background
Arguments superior earlier than the CAS

Kyiv Capitals’ arguments
The Federation’s arguments

What’s the area of play doctrine?
The choice
Impression of the ruling