Charles III was topped at Westminster Abbey two years in the past as we speak. A lot custom is sure up with the coronation, however how a lot of it’s binding on the monarch, and what components of it will probably his successor cast off, ought to he want? On this submit, Carolyn Harris and Philippe Lagassé define the distinction between a constitutional conference, which is taken into account to be constitutionally binding, and customized and apply, which aren’t. They talk about how Charles III’s coronation differed from these of his predecessors, earlier than trying ahead to the coronation of the subsequent monarch and the way the present inheritor to the throne may also do issues in a different way, ought to he develop into king.
The second anniversary of the coronation of King Charles III presents a chance to replicate on the significance of the occasion. While the coronation is clearly a ceremony infused with custom and non secular significance; it’s also a constitutional second. As we lately argued in The Political Quarterly, core components of the coronation serve a constitutional perform that is still essential as we speak, nevertheless antiquated they might seem like. Certainly, the coronation’s constitutional function arguably explains why vital components of the ceremony have endured into the twenty first century.
Though core components of the coronation are constitutional in nature, the ceremony is just not a creature of parliament, in distinction to the royal succession, which is set by laws relationship again to the 1701 Act of Settlement. As a substitute, the coronation ceremony flows from the character of the Crown within the British structure. As with many facets of the Crown and the structure, the coronation operates based on unwritten guidelines, insofar as they aren’t codified in a legally binding doc.
The unwritten guidelines of the British structure are sometimes termed conventions. The time period is used pretty loosely to seek advice from these guidelines that aren’t codified or that lack a statutory footing. But not all unwritten guidelines needs to be correctly understood as conventions. There are two different sorts of unwritten guidelines that seem like conventions however are distinct from them. These guidelines are practices and customs. When analysing the unwritten guidelines that encompass the coronation, it’s helpful to understand the distinction between conference, apply, and customized.
What’s a constitutional conference?
As defined by Ivor Jennings, unwritten guidelines should meet a three-part take a look at to rise to the extent of a constitutional conference. First, there have to be a ‘cause for the rule’. Put merely, the rule have to be nested in a constitutional function of some type. The rationale could also be tied to a constitutional precept, such because the precept of democracy or parliamentary sovereignty. It could even be related with a extra sensible constitutional consideration, equivalent to distributing energy between establishments and actors. Nonetheless others could serve to present life to an overarching constitutional norm, which is why conventions have been described as a type of constitutional morality. What issues is that there’s an underlying constitutional rationale for the rule.
Jennings’ second criterion holds that conventions have to be supported by ample precedents. A rule that has solely lately been launched is unlikely to depend as a conference. A conference wants time to correctly take root and be well-defined and understood by constitutional actors. New guidelines which might be merely declared to exist could have a rationale behind them, however they won’t mechanically develop into conventions till they’ve proved their price and significance. Certainly, the haste to declare any unwritten rule a conference, even within the absence of well-worn precedents, helps clarify why there’s skepticism towards the usefulness of the idea. Newly launched guidelines could not final past the circumstances of their inception or they might be ignored. When these circumstances happen, it doesn’t imply that conference has been violated; it merely signifies that the brand new rule by no means attained the extent of conference to start with, because it didn’t develop into well-anchored by successive precedents. Solely these unwritten guidelines which have been revered over time and have many precedents to again them up needs to be termed conventions.
The third criterion set out by Jennings holds that conventions are understood as binding by constitutional actors. This criterion displays the ability of the opposite two. A rule whose rationale is taken into account sufficiently compelling is more likely to accepted as binding. Equally, a rule that enjoys constant precedents could have a better likelihood of being seen as binding by totally different constitutional actors. But not all guidelines shall be really binding. If a rule could possibly be simply deserted with out a lot opposition, then it isn’t a conference, however another type of rule.
Practices and customs
An utility of Jennings’ take a look at permits us to differentiate between conventions, practices, and customs. Practices are unwritten guidelines which have a constitutional rationale however lack sustained precedents and widespread acceptance that they’re binding. As an example, the rule that the Home of Commons should approve worldwide navy deployments is a apply, fairly than a conference. The rationale for the rule is evident: the legislature’s help needs to be secured earlier than deploying the armed forces abroad. But the rule lacks clear precedents and isn’t thought-about really binding. Over time, the apply of securing the Commons’ approval for worldwide navy deployments could develop into a conference, as successive precedents higher outline the contours of the rule and constitutional actors consider that they need to abide by the rule. In the meanwhile, nevertheless, the apply is merely auditioning to develop into a conference.
Customs face the other problem. They’re guidelines which have robust precedents and are thought-about binding by custom however lack a compelling constitutional rationale. In some circumstances, customs are conventions from a earlier period whose causes are now not related. For instance, the rule that the monarch doesn’t enter the Commons was as soon as supported by a powerful cause: the Crown had threatened MPs with arrest main as much as the Civil Struggle and it was important to guard the chamber from comparable transgressions. In the present day, this rationale has fallen away. With the appearance of accountable authorities, the manager sits within the Commons and the Crown poses no risk to members. Nonetheless, the rule that the Crown doesn’t enter the Commons continues to be adopted in the UK due to centuries of custom. We all know, nevertheless, that this rule could possibly be jettisoned with relative ease by unicameral legislatures in different Westminster states. Within the absence of a second home, these unicameral legislatures permit the Crown to enter the chamber to present the speech from the throne. In contrast to conventions, the absence of a compelling constitutional rationale makes customs weak to comparatively easy abandonment.
Utilizing Jennings’ standards, we are able to due to this fact differentiate between conventions, practices, and customs based mostly on the presence or absence of a compelling cause, precedents, and binding acceptance.
The coronation course of: conference, customized or apply?
With this typology of unwritten guidelines established, we now flip to the specifics of the coronation. We discover that the coronation accommodates all three sorts of guidelines, with the core side of the ceremony being conventions, more moderen additions being practices, and the much less salient components being customs. In 1973, Elizabeth II attended a ceremony at Tub Abbey commemorating the a thousandth anniversary of the coronation of the Anglo-Saxon king, Edgar the Peaceful. The coronation service written by Dunstan, Archbishop of Canterbury in 973, included the presentation of the monarch to the folks, an anointment with holy oil, an investiture with royal regalia, a coronation oath, acts of homage and the crowning of the queen consort. These facets of the ceremony proceed to be central to the coronation service within the twenty first century, forming established constitutional conventions. For the coronation to realize its constitutional function of confirming the brand new reign, it have to be extremely seen to the general public in order that there isn’t any query regarding the identification of the brand new monarch. The legitimacy of the royal marriage is bolstered by the crowning and anointing of the queen consort.
The crowning and anointing show the twin spiritual and secular roles of the sovereign as Supreme Governor of the Church of England and constitutional monarch of the UK, Commonwealth realms and different territories. The significance of the crowning and the anointing to the constitutional legitimacy of the coronation is demonstrated by the willpower of earlier monarchs to not proceed with the ceremony until these rituals had been carried out of their entirety. Charles II commissioned new regalia after the restoration of the English monarchy in 1660 and his coronation didn’t happen till this regalia was current in 1661. Edward VII rejected a suggestion to scale back the size of the anointing ritual after his coronation had been postponed in 1902 in order that he might obtain an emergency operation for appendicitis. The variety of attendees paying formal homage to the monarch has diversified over time however some type of ceremony of this sort stays a part of the coronation to the current day. On the coronation of Charles III, the Prince of Wales (Prince William) and the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, paid homage to the sovereign, emphasising the monarch’s twin secular and non secular position.
The coronation of Charles III launched new practices which will develop into conventions to replicate the monarch’s position as head of a various Commonwealth of 56 international locations together with, on the time of writing, 14 realms along with the UK. As Prince of Wales, the long run Charles III championed interfaith dialogue and his inclusion of a variety of religion leaders at his coronation will doubtless proceed to happen at future coronations. The prominence of the Commonwealth delegations on the coronation of Charles III and the show of an anointing display displaying the names of all of the Commonwealth international locations can also develop into a longtime apply if future monarchs are additionally Head of the Commonwealth and sovereign of a number of Commonwealth realms.
Whereas every coronation ceremony attracts upon centuries of customized, the person customs which might be retained replicate the character and priorities of every successive monarch in addition to the political and cultural circumstances of their occasions. Over the previous 200 years, public opinion and media scrutiny of coronation ceremonies have performed an essential position in adapting sure customs for a mass viewers and abandoning different customs altogether. The accession of William IV in 1830, following the unpopular reign of his older brother, George IV, introduced an finish to quite a few coronation customs together with the serving of a lavish coronation dinner to distinguished friends in Westminster Corridor and the hereditary King’s (or Queen’s) champion difficult anybody who contested the legitimacy of the brand new reign to trial by fight. The general public censure directed towards George IV for his extravagance in the course of the financial despair that adopted the tip of the Napoleonic Wars prompted his successor, a former naval officer who had a lot easier tastes, to carry an finish to sure customs that had been essential to the general public picture of medieval monarchs however gave the impression to be superfluous to the nineteenth century constitutional monarchy. William IV additionally rejected George IV’s efforts to introduce new customs equivalent to friends concerned within the ceremony carrying costumes impressed by Tudor and Stuart period fashions. This distinctive apparel stays distinctive to the coronation of George IV.
In distinction, Elizabeth II’s resolution to permit her coronation to be televised could have bolstered sure customs within the fashionable creativeness, shaping expectations relating to the setting of the coronation. Because the crowning of the final Anglo-Saxon king, Harold II, in 1066, the placement of the coronation has been Westminster Abbey in London. Henry III had his first coronation at Gloucester Abbey in 1216 because of the circumstances of the First Barons’ Struggle however he clearly thought-about this ceremony to be inadequate as he requested papal permission for a second coronation at Westminster Abbey in 1220. Whereas there isn’t any constitutional cause why the coronation should happen in a specific place, the televising of the coronation could have bolstered this centuries-old customized by showcasing the setting of the ceremony for a worldwide viewers.
The present Prince of Wales shares William IV’s disinterest in pointless royal ceremonies. Whereas the long run kings Edward VIII and Charles III participated in a public investiture as Prince of Wales in 1911 and 1969 respectively, Prince William obtained the title of Prince of Wales in 2022 with no formal investiture. The transition from the reign of Charles III to that of William V will due to this fact doubtless lead to a shorter, easier ceremony with fewer of the centuries-old customs related to coronations. Constitutional conventions in addition to practices that replicate the social and cultural circumstances of the twenty first century, nevertheless, will proceed to be current at future coronations.
In regards to the authors
Carolyn S. Harris is a historian, writer, royal commentator and teacher in historical past on the College of Toronto College of Persevering with Research.
Philippe Lagassé is affiliate professor and Barton Chair at Carleton College, Ottawa, Canada.
![[CFP] 6th Young Legal Researchers Conference 2025](https://i2.wp.com/assets.pubpub.org/dszqce38/favicon-61724872708457-01724931428186.png?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)
