When inventive identification meets company branding, the place does copyright legislation draw the road?
In a brand new episode of The Briefing, Scott Hervey and Richard Buckley talk about the lawsuit filed by artist Tyrrell Winston in opposition to the New Orleans Pelicans.
Winston—whose distinctive sculptures of deflated basketballs organized in grids have been exhibited worldwide and licensed by manufacturers like Nike, Adidas, and even NBA groups—claims the Pelicans copied his signature type in a social media marketing campaign.
His lawsuit raises a serious query for artists, manufacturers, and IP attorneys alike: Can a particular inventive type be protected beneath copyright legislation?
The dialog compares Winston’s declare to the “vibe copyright” case (Sydney Nicole v. Alyssa Sheil) and examines whether or not courts are increasing safety from expression into ideas and aesthetics.
Watch this episode on YouTube or take heed to this podcast episode right here.










![One-Week Faculty Development Programme (FDP) on Literature as a Repository of Indian Knowledge Systems by NLU Tripura [Online; Aug 25-30; 7 Pm-8:30 Pm]: Register by Aug 24](https://i2.wp.com/cdn.lawctopus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Faculty-Development-Programme-FDP-on-Literature-as-a-Repository-of-Indian-Knowledge-Systems-by-NLU-Tripura.png?w=120&resize=120,86&ssl=1)








