After dropping its anti-SLAPP movement, Warner Bros. has appealed in Roadrunner JMTC LLC v. Warner Bros. Tv, the lawsuit introduced by Michael Crichton’s property claiming the brand new collection The Pitt is an unauthorized by-product of ER.
On this episode of The Briefing, Weintraub Tobin attorneys Scott Hervey and Tara Sattler talk about:
The background behind the ER “freeze clause”
Warner Bros.’ First Modification arguments below California’s anti-SLAPP statute
The battle over what “by-product work” actually means
How the trial courtroom dealt with the Katz declaration
The broader implications for inventive freedom and legacy IP
Watch this episode on YouTube or hearken to this podcast episode right here.


![Internship Opportunity at Rashtriya Raksha University, Gandhinagar [Online; Multiple Roles]: Apply Now!](https://i2.wp.com/cdn.lawctopus.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/efsl-post-1-1.jpeg?w=350&resize=350,250&ssl=1)















