The Oregon legislative session formally kicked off this week, on Tuesday, January twenty first. It’s a daily session in 2025, which means we’re in for an extended stretch — a 160-day calendar, versus the 35-day affair we see in even-numbered years.
In case you learn any of the information articles previewing the 2025 session, you received’t see hashish as a legislative precedence. Probably, you received’t see it talked about in any respect. Legislators appear each cautious and weary of hashish: the 2023 trade scandals implicating public officers are nonetheless pretty latest; and, after ten dynamic years and a whole bunch of grownup use hashish proposals, payments and legal guidelines, this system must breathe.
All of that stated, the Hashish Trade Affiliation of Oregon (CIAO) and others have been engaged on their want lists, and I do count on to see just a few new hashish legal guidelines in 2025. Most of will probably be scaffolding and upkeep.
Beneath, I summarize the draft payments presently teed up within the 2025 session (with hyperlinks), and provides some cursory feedback. However first I’ll add my ordinary caveat: a big majority of those launched payments won’t go. Some comprise overlapping ideas and can by no means go to committee, whereas others will fail after a listening to or two, or be consolidated into omnibus or placeholder payments.
This is among the omnibus payments, and one to observe. Its drafter described it to me yesterday as “omnibus however not full,” in truth. Right here’s what’s in there as of at this time:
Authorizes the destruction of hoop homes when executing a search warrant to research the illegal manufacturing of marijuana.
This strikes me as probably problematic, as a due course of problem.
Requires the OLCC to make maps of licensed industrial hemp operations and marijuana manufacturing premises out there to the Water Assets Division and the Division of Environmental High quality.
An inter-agency communication problem. Been on the listing for some time.
Repeals the prohibition on a marijuana retailer finding inside 1,000 ft of a constructing the place a public prekindergarten or kindergarten program is offered.
One thing we’ve handled greater than as soon as, together with with the Division of Justice manner again when. Only a clarification wanted.
Permits the State Division of Agriculture to examine biomass and processed industrial hemp saved on the location of a licensed industrial hemp operation.
Listed here are just a few ideas which may be added:
Grant OLCC authority to maneuver from a one-year licensing cycle to a two-year cycle, as with alcohol.
This might lower lots of crimson tape for each OLCC and trade. The satan could be within the particulars as to marijuana retailer tax points, however as an idea I actually prefer it.
Re-up the grant program focusing on unlawful grows in southwest Oregon, at present service ranges.
This grant has been round since 2018: the sheriffs and sufferer’s rights of us are the primary proponents. In case you’d wish to see information, the Oregon Felony Justice Fee program printed a latest report right here.
Requires OHA to check the medical use of marijuana.
It is a humorous little invoice and doubtless only a placeholder. We’ve solely had a medical marijuana statute in Oregon for 27 years!
Removes necessities {that a} registry identification cardholder who produces marijuana for private medical use register with OHA.
Requires an individual liable for a marijuana develop website that produces marijuana for medical use for 3 or extra registry identification cardholders to use for a designation from the OLCC.
Directs OHA to problem digital registration playing cards.
Requires marijuana retailers to supply on the market medical grade cannabinoid objects that comprise no more than 20 % complete THC.
Creates well being care and employment protections for an individual who’s a registry identification cardholder.
That is an Oregon Hashish Fee invoice with some sturdy ideas, however it is going to want lots of amending. OLCC has been slowly absorbing OHA’s medical marijuana program for years. At first that upset individuals, however a full windup is a fait accompli. SB 162 has a superb probability to go in some type.
Requires OLCC to check hashish.
Directs OLCC to submit findings to the interim committees of the Legislative Meeting associated to the judiciary not later than September 15, 2026.
Placeholder.
Similar as SB 188. Placeholder.
Ends particular tax evaluation for land, if the proprietor or the individual answerable for the land will get a civil penalty for rising marijuana on the land or is discovered responsible of rising it there.
Makes an exception if the proprietor moderately didn’t know in regards to the pot or known as the police as quickly as they did know.
Disqualifies land from farm use particular assessments upon a closing civil penalty or judgment of conviction for the unlawful rising of marijuana in opposition to the landowner or individual in possession and management of the land.
Offers an exception for a landowner or different obligated taxpayer who moderately lacked information of the unlawful rising of marijuana or promptly notified a regulation enforcement company of the unlawful rising of marijuana.
This invoice seems to be poorly conceived and poorly structured at current. I’m guessing it doesn’t go wherever for a number of causes, not least of which would be the fiscal affect consideration.
One-liner: establishes a division within the Division of State Police to implement legal guidelines associated to unlawful marijuana cultivation.
I doubt it goes wherever.
This one, together with SB 557 and 558 slightly below, are the CIAO payments. (You’ll be able to view CIAO’s legislative priorities right here.) Every of those payments are sponsored by Senator Floyd Prozanski, longtime trade supporter.
Permits a marijuana producer, marijuana wholesaler, marijuana processor or marijuana retailer to make use of a movement detection digital camera system at a licensed premises.
I used to be shocked this is able to be disallowed by OLCC.
Directs OLCC to ascertain by rule an industrial hemp endorsement for marijuana producers.
Prohibits OLCC from requiring bodily tags or different identifiers on sure marijuana crops.
This might be very helpful and lower down on numerous pointless “compliance” and labor and waste.
Permits a marijuana merchandise transport car to make use of a digital manifest and edit the manifest throughout transport.
Let’s get with the instances.
Permits the State Division of Agriculture (ODA) to outline “industrial hemp” by rule.
Permits a marijuana licensee to have interaction within the interstate commerce of business hemp and marijuana. Turns into operative if federal regulation or the US Division of Justice enable or tolerate the interstate commerce of business hemp or marijuana.
I must ask about this too. In 2019, we handed SB 582 which already permits export of marijuana when the federal atmosphere adjustments. This proposal appears very related.
Requires a minimum of one OLCC commissioner to carry a marijuana processor, marijuana producer, marijuana retailer or marijuana wholesaler license.
Inventive, and doubtless going nowhere.
Permits a marijuana licensee to supply samples of marijuana objects to different marijuana licensees at non permanent occasions registered with OLCC.
Permits the fee to ascertain by rule a brief occasions registration system. Permits a marijuana wholesaler to promote marijuana objects to a marijuana retailer at a brief occasion.
Permits a marijuana producer to supply samples of seeds and immature marijuana crops to permitted staff.
Permits a marijuana producer, marijuana processor and marijuana wholesaler to supply samples of marijuana objects in specified quantities to permitted staff.
A bunch of rulemaking arising for OLCC if this passes. However it all is sensible.
Will increase the utmost share of tax that the governing physique of a metropolis or county might impose on the sale of marijuana objects. 20% of the proceeds go to the town or county at problem.
Requires a share of a newly enacted or elevated quantity to be transferred to the county through which the accumulating retail institution is positioned, offered the county is eligible for Oregon Marijuana Account distributions.
This can get the hashish trade’s hackles up, severely. Comparable payments have been crushed again in prior years and I count on the identical end result right here.
Establishes a state public financial institution job drive.
The Governor vetoed this invoice final time round, citing “logistical challenges.” I haven’t had an opportunity to speak with the sponsors of SB 583, so I’m undecided what the plan is on reintroduction. As a man from North Dakota — the one state within the union with a state-chartered financial institution; and as an equitable banking entry proponent — I hope this one succeeds.
Exempts from public information disclosure the residential tackle or private cellphone variety of a person who holds a allow issued beneath ORS 475C.273.
The reference there may be to marijuana employee permits. Good concept. The proposed regulation ought to in all probability sweep in ORS 475C.269 as nicely.
States that the individual should inform the OHA or the OLCC the place the individual plans to develop, course of or produce the marijuana or psilocybin and who owns the positioning that the individual plans to make use of. Specifies some instances when the OHA or the OLCC can not give permission to the individual.
Requires an applicant for a license to fabricate psilocybin to undergo OHA info concerning the possession and site of the premises to be licensed, and prohibits the authority from issuing a license in specified circumstances.
Requires an applicant for a license to supply or course of marijuana to undergo the OLCC info concerning the possession and site of the premises to be licensed. Prohibits the fee from issuing a license in specified circumstances.
Requires an applicant for a medical marijuana develop website or medical marijuana processing website registration to undergo the authority info concerning the possession and site of the premises to be registered. Prohibits OHA from issuing a registration in specified circumstances.
It is a massive and rangy invoice with ideas overlapping a few of the others. Count on it to be absorbed someplace, in some type.
Offers objects which have hashish in them should have a label that claims an individual must be a minimum of 21 years outdated to devour or use the merchandise.
Requires labels on marijuana objects and inhalant supply programs that comprise industrial hemp-derived vapor objects to incorporate that the minimal age for consumption or use is 21 years of age.
Everybody must re-do their labels.
Requires that marijuana objects and shops warn people who using marijuana by an individual who’s pregnant may trigger hazard.
Requires a marijuana retailer and a medical marijuana dispensary to put up warning indicators concerning the consumption or use of marijuana throughout being pregnant.
Requires marijuana objects and inhalant supply programs that comprise an industrial-hemp derived vapor merchandise to incorporate in labeling that consumption or use of marijuana throughout being pregnant could also be harmful.
Some speech and label points right here.
Requires OLCC to check itself. Directs OLCC to submit findings to the interim committees of the Legislative Meeting associated to financial growth not later than September 15, 2026.
Placeholder. Similar as 2276.
Just like the 2 above.
Directs OLCC to take a look at hashish and report back to the judiciary committees. Directs the fee to submit findings to the interim committees of the Legislative Meeting associated to the judiciary not later than September 15, 2026.
I imagine this one additionally comes by way of the Oregon Hashish Fee, like SB 176. And like SB 176, it probably has legs however may even see some amendments alongside the best way.
Offers that organizations that present hospice, palliative care or house well being care providers, in addition to sure residential services, should write insurance policies and educate their employees in regards to the medical use of marijuana.
Similar requirement of any such group or residential facility that’s designated as a further caregiver for a medical marijuana cardholder.
Protects a corporation or residential facility and its workers and contractors from sure felony legal responsibility associated to the medical use of marijuana.
Prohibits the Oregon State Board of Nursing from taking disciplinary motion in opposition to a nurse for discussing the medical use of marijuana with a affected person. (Be aware: nurses are already allowed by statute to debate medical marijuana use with sufferers, in step with First Modification protections)
Expands the definition of “debilitating medical situation” for the medical use of marijuana. The particular add-on I’m seeing is “the necessity for hospice, palliative care, consolation care or different symptom administration, together with complete ache administration.”
______
That’s all she wrote for now. I’ll examine in once more on the finish of the session, or earlier than that with any vital developments.
