Since its inception in 2001, the annual survey on Chinese language judicial follow in non-public worldwide legislation, printed by the Chinese language Journal of Worldwide Legislation, has served as a beneficial supply of knowledge on Chinese language follow in non-public worldwide legislation, notably in periods when case legislation was not available (notably previous to 2013). The primary annual survery, titled ‘Personal Worldwide Legislation within the Chinese language Judicial Observe in 2001’, appeared in Vol. 2(1), 2003, and was ready by Professors Huang Jin and Du Huangfang. Nonetheless, in its early years, the survey was not printed frequently. Certainly, along with the 2001 survey, solely three others have been printed between 2005 and 2014: the survey for the yr 2002 (printed in 2005), for 2003 (printed in 2008), and for 2006 (printed in 2009).
Since 2015, the common publication of the survey has been ensured by Professor He Qisheng of Peking College Legislation Faculty below the title “Chronology of Observe: Chinese language Observe in Personal Worldwide Legislation”. (For earlier bulletins on this weblog, see the posts for 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021. Annual surveys for the years 2013 to 2018 are additionally obtainable on Professor He’s SSRN web page.) Professor He’s dedication to sustaining and increasing the annual survey has been instrumental in making certain it stays an indispensable useful resource for the sphere, whereas making info on non-public worldwide legislation in China readily accessible to non-Sinophone researchers.
With that mentioned, the Chronology of Observe: Chinese language Observe in Personal Worldwide Legislation in 2023 is now obtainable, marking the eleventh consecutive annual survey since 2015. This yr’s version is especially noteworthy because it consists of English translations of just lately enacted authorized provisions, embody amongst others:
The brand new provisions on worldwide jurisdiction (Chapter 24, “Jurisdiction” of the Civil Process Legislation (2023 Modification), Arts. 276–282),
Provisions on service of course of and taking of proof (Chapter 25, “Service of Course of, Taking of Proof, and Intervals” of the Civil Process Legislation (2023 Modification), Arts. 283–287),
Provisions on overseas judgments (Arts. 293–296 of the Civil Process Legislation (2023 Modification)), and
The Supreme Folks’s Court docket Interpretation on Sure Points In regards to the Software of the Legislation of the PRC on the Software of Legislation to International-Associated Civil Relations (II) (Arts. 1–13).
Like its predecessors, this yr’s survey gives vital updates and additional enhances accessibility to key authorized developments for researchers and practitioners of personal worldwide legislation.
The summary of 2023 survey reads as follows:
The survey of the Chinese language practices in non-public worldwide legislation in 2023 highlights the next points: First, 4 new legal guidelines and two administrative rules, three judicial interpretations by the Supreme Folks’s Court docket (“SPC”) have been formulated, and 6 teams of 44 typical instances have been chosen by the SPC. Notably, China acceded to the Hague Apostille Conference this yr. Moreover, Chinese language courts concluded 24,000 foreign-related civil and business instances, 16,000 maritime instances, and 16,000 business arbitration judicial evaluation instances. Second, Half IV of the Civil Process Legislation was amended to incorporate new provisions addressing jurisdiction, service of course of overseas, taking of proof and durations, in addition to recognition and enforcement of overseas judgments and arbitral awards. These new guidelines and related instances are introduced all through the Survey. Third, the applying of worldwide treaties and practices has emerged as a major matter, with new guidelines within the International Relations Legislation and the SPC Interpretation of Worldwide Treaties and Worldwide Practices. Moreover, the SPC chosen 14 consultant instances on this regard. Fourth, regarding the ascertainment of overseas legal guidelines, the SPC issued two judicial interpretations and chosen three related instances. Fifth, relating to the judicial evaluation of arbitration instances, the SPC has chosen a number of Typical Circumstances of Judicial Evaluation of Arbitration, which function vital guiding examples.
The desk of content material of the paper is as follows:
I. Introduction
II. Overview
II.A. Report on the Work of the SPC in 2023
II.B. New legal guidelines and the SPC’s judicial interpretations
II.C. Typical instances
III. Jurisdiction
III.A. Guidelines within the Civil Process Legislation 2023
III.B. Selection of court docket settlement
III.B.i. Commonplace phrases and circumstances
III.B.ii. Uneven selection of court docket settlement
III.C. Discussion board non comfort
I.V. Selection of legislation
IV.A. Characterization
IV.B. Ascertainment of overseas legislation
IV.B.i. SPC Personal Worldwide Legislation Interpretation II
IV.B.ii. SPC Choice on Amending the CICC Provisions
IV.B.iii. Circumstances on ascertainment of overseas legal guidelines
IV.C. Extraterritoriality of Chinese language legal guidelines
V. Worldwide conventions and worldwide practices
V.A. International Relations Legislation
V.B. SPC Interpretation of Worldwide Treaties and Worldwide Practices
V.C. Circumstances on the applying of worldwide conventions
V.D. Circumstances on the applying of worldwide practices
VI. Service of course of, taking of proof and durations
VI.A. Guidelines within the Civil Process Legislation 2023
VI.B. Service of course of overseas
VI.C. Proof
VI.D. Apostille
VII. International Judgments
VII.A. Guidelines within the Civil Process Legislation 2023
VII.B. Circumstances about recognition and enforcement of overseas judgments
VIII. Worldwide arbitration and overseas arbitral awards
VIII.A. Guidelines within the Civil Process Legislation 2023
VIII.B. Judicial evaluation of arbitration