The observe of ordering a civil judgment for prices and fines on the outset of a felony case has run its course.
That’s the rule from State v. Santana, ___ N.C. App. ___ (2025), which I summarized earlier within the week. To recap, the defendant in Santana was convicted of drug trafficking and different offenses and ordered to pay a $250,000 advantageous. As is commonly the case for defendants sentenced to energetic time, the trial courtroom ordered the advantageous and different prices as a civil judgment. The defendant argued on attraction that the trial courtroom had no authority to docket the cash instantly as a civil judgment.

The courtroom of appeals agreed. Underneath G.S. 15A-1365, prices and fines could be docketed civilly upon default. A judgment docketed at the moment “turns into a lien on the true property of the defendant in the identical method as do judgments in civil actions.” G.S. 15A-1365. However, the courtroom held in Santana, they can’t be docketed instantly. Had the Basic Meeting meant to authorize fast docketing of fines and prices, the courtroom stated, “it may have performed in order it did with lawyer’s charges.” Slip op. at 7 (citing G.S. 7A-455(b)).
The courtroom famous that the advantageous the trial courtroom ordered was due instantly (as prices and fines are, until in any other case specified by the courtroom, G.S. 15A-1362(b)). However the trial courtroom erred by docketing a civil judgment for it with out first figuring out that the defendant had defaulted on it. The courtroom added that the defendant was prejudiced by the early entry of the judgment, because it had already accrued over $17,000 in curiosity. The courtroom remanded the matter to the trial courtroom to impose the advantageous and prices as a part of its felony judgment, or to find out whether or not the defendant has defaulted, at which level it may enter a brand new civil judgment.
It is a high-volume difficulty. It has change into a typical observe for our courts to enter fines and prices as civil judgments in any case that ends in an energetic punishment (and typically within the probationary instances too). I’ve written about it quite a few occasions over time—concerning civil judgments for restitution in 2009, for courtroom prices in 2012, for financial obligations typically in 2016, and Schoolhouse Rock–type in 2017. (For that final submit, graphic novel illustrator Jason Whitley drew the anthropomorphic civil judgment that was tailored for at present’s submit.)
How did we get right here? Right here’s what I believe occurred. Earlier than 2011, courtroom prices didn’t apply when the judgment imposed an energetic sentence until the trial courtroom explicitly stated so. G.S. 7A-304 was amended that yr to say that courtroom prices apply in each case, no matter sentence, until the courtroom makes a discovering of simply trigger to grant a price waiver. S.L. 2011-145, sec. 15.10.(a).
In 2012 the legislature added a requirement that the courtroom make findings of truth and conclusions of regulation in help of any resolution to waive prices. In 2017, it added the requirement to offer 15-day written discover by first-class mail and a possibility to be heard by any authorities entity that’s instantly affected by a price waiver. S.L. 2017-57.
Lengthy story brief, waiving prices and fines turned tougher at the exact same time that prices have been being utilized to defendants serving energetic time. Add to that the sensible realization that defendants serving an energetic sentence are much less prone to pay their cash. In opposition to that backdrop, the observe of ordering felony obligations as civil judgments took maintain as a type of strain launch.
And it turned routine—with variations in native observe all through the state. Coaching supplies for clerks from the Administrative Workplace of the Courts monitor the refined, evolving variations between financial obligations owed criminally, civilly, or (to make use of the language of the supplies) as a “twin obligation.” An excerpt from these supplies captures the complexity of the problem:
An obligation could also be due BOTH criminally and civilly if ordered by a decide. The courtroom clerk may have to hunt clarification of the decide’s intent. For example, if the decide orders prices be docketed, the clerk might need to search clarification as as to whether or not the decide intends for the prices to even be owed criminally. Equally, the courtroom clerk might search clarification if the decide orders lawyer charges in open courtroom at a revocation listening to. Since such charges are usually docketed because of a signed Legal professional Price Software Order, did the decide additionally intend for the quantity to be owed criminally?
N.C. Administrative Workplace of the Courts, Felony Monies Owed as Felony and/or Civil Judgments: Teacher Information (Jan. 4, 2017).
Regardless of this complexity, there are just a few different associated issues we all know for positive.
First, do not forget that beneath State v. Crew, 281 N.C. App. 437 (2022), a courtroom has no authority to order a civil judgment for restitution for an offense not coated beneath the Crime Victims’ Rights Act.
Second, lawyer charges are a civil judgment from the outset. That’s simply the best way the statute for them is written. G.S. 7A-455. They’re thus permissible, and no discovering of default is required earlier than docketing them.
And eventually, curiosity accrues on civil judgments for fines, lawyer charges, and restitution at 8 % every year. G.S. 24-1. There isn’t a curiosity on a judgment for prices. G.S. 24-5.
After Santana, it looks as if 1000’s of judgments ordered civilly and not using a discovering of default are in all probability topic to problem. However that doesn’t essentially imply that the observe of ordering civil judgments for financial obligations has run its course. Even in Santana’s case, the trial courtroom may have the chance on remand to contemplate whether or not the defendant is in default on cost of the advantageous, and in that case, it could docket a judgment. Will anybody gather on it? I mentioned that right here.



















