How Appealing Weekly Roundup – Above the Law

Ed. Word: A weekly roundup of only a few gadgets from Howard Bashman’s How Interesting weblog, the Internet’s first weblog dedicated to appellate litigation. Try these tales and extra at How Interesting.

“Republicans’ New, Harmful Try and Break the Election: Even when the Supreme Courtroom rejects this plea, the GOP will advance its reason behind sowing doubt within the electoral course of all the identical.” Legislation professor Bob Bauer has this essay on-line at The Atlantic.

“Justice Division alerts plan to salvage obstruction prices in some Jan. 6 instances; Prosecutors nonetheless see a path to conviction for some defendants, even whereas dropping the cost in different instances following a Supreme Courtroom ruling”: Kyle Cheney and Josh Gerstein of Politico have this report.

“Supreme Courtroom’s ‘shadow docket’ returns with a vengeance”: John Fritze and Devan Cole of CNN have this report.

“MIT’s Drop in Black College students Exhibits Fallout From High Courtroom Ruling; The enrollment numbers give an early indication of how US schools are grappling with a Supreme Courtroom choice that banned race as a consider admissions”: Francesca Maglione and Janet Lorin of Bloomberg Information have this report.

“Trump Takes Fascist Risk to Subsequent Degree With New Proposal on Judges; Donald Trump desires to make it a criminal offense to criticize any judges who like him; Think about what that might imply”: Paige Oamek has this essay on-line at The New Republic.

“The Puzzling SCOTUS Ruling on Transgender Rights and Title IX”: Michael C. Dorf has this submit at his weblog, “Dorf on Legislation.”