Wednesday, July 23, 2025
Law And Order News
  • Home
  • Law and Legal
  • Military and Defense
  • International Conflict
  • Crimes
  • Constitution
  • Cyber Crimes
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Law and Legal
  • Military and Defense
  • International Conflict
  • Crimes
  • Constitution
  • Cyber Crimes
No Result
View All Result
Law And Order News
No Result
View All Result
Home Constitution

Dharavi redevelopment project: Bombay High Court rejects plea challenging award of contract to Adani properties – India Legal

Dharavi redevelopment project: Bombay High Court rejects plea challenging award of contract to Adani properties – India Legal


The Bombay Excessive Court docket on Friday dismissed a petition difficult the Maharashtra authorities’s choice to cancel its 2019 bid for the redevelopment of Dharavi slums in Mumbai and subject a brand new tender in 2022, which was awarded to Adani Properties.

The Bench of Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Amit Borkar handed the order on a petition filed by UAE-based firm SecLink Applied sciences Company.

The Excessive Court docket famous that since at the very least two bidders had certified below the brand new tender course of, it couldn’t be argued that the situations had been tailor-made to learn a single bidder.

The Excessive Court docket famous that in response to the contemporary tender, three bidders had participated out of which two bids had been discovered to be technically certified. Since greater than two bidders participated within the tender course of, out of which two had been declared technically certified for the method, it can’t be stated that the tender situations had been tailored to go well with solely a specific bidder.

The petitioner sought to reverse the Maharashtra authorities’s choice, which annulled Seclink’s profitable Rs 7,200-crore bid from 2019 and launched a brand new bidding course of in 2022.

The brand new tender led to the award of the venture to Adani Infrastructure and Builders Personal Restricted with a bid of Rs 5,069 crore.

Seclink had initially gained the bid for the Dharavi redevelopment venture in 2019, surpassing Adani’s Rs 4,539 crore supply.

In 2022, nevertheless, the Eknath Shinde-led authorities included 45 acres of railway land within the redevelopment plan for slum rehabilitation, a change not a part of the unique proposal.

To accommodate the price of buying this land, the federal government sought authorized recommendation. The then Advocate Common Ashutosh Kumbhakoni really useful a brand new tender reflecting these modifications.

Seclink argued that the inclusion of railway land had already been factored into the unique 2019 bid, because the bid map included practically 90 acres of railway land.

The corporate claimed that the federal government’s choice to cancel the 2019 bid was unjustified and that the brand new tender phrases had been designed to exclude them and profit Adani. Seclink additionally said that it suffered a monetary lack of Rs 8,424 crore because of the cancellation.

The Counsel showing for the Maharashtra authorities argued that the revised tender situations had been mandatory attributable to important modifications within the financial panorama between 2019 and 2022.

These included components just like the Covid-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine battle, fluctuations within the Rupee-USD change charge, and rate of interest volatility, all of which affected the monetary surroundings and investor confidence.

The Bench dominated that the choice to cancel the tender to incorporate railway land can’t be stated to be ‘non-existent,’ ‘unjustified’ or based mostly on any ‘perversity’.

The Excessive Court docket famous that the railway land was not a part of the preliminary proposal and that Seclink was conscious of this truth.

The MoU between the Rail Land Improvement Authority (RLDA) and the Dharavi Redevelopment Mission (DRP)/Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SPA) was signed solely in March 2019, after the tender was floated and bids had been submitted.

The Bench additional noticed that Seclink didn’t have any ‘vested proper’ to win the contract based mostly on the declaration within the March 8, 2019 letter, which merely said that Seclink was the very best bidder.

It stated merely on account of the declaration by the DRP/SPA vide its letter dated March 8, 2019 that the petitioner was the very best bidder, no proper could possibly be stated to have vested within the petitioner; neither wouldn’t it quantity to the concluded contract.

The Bench additional stated that the monetary loss Seclink incurred because of the cancellation of its bid couldn’t invalidate the federal government’s choice to cancel the tender course of.

It famous that merely as a result of sure expenditure may need been incurred by the petitioner wouldn’t vitiate the impugned motion on a part of the respondent authorities to cancel the sooner tender course of.

Seclink couldn’t problem the contemporary tender course of because it had not participated within the new bidding or the pre-bid assembly, it added.

The Bench dominated that the petitioner selected to not take part within the contemporary tender course of. It was a settled place of legislation that the one who has not participated within the tender and has additionally not participated even within the pre-bid assembly can’t be permitted to problem the phrases and situations of the tender.



Source link

Tags: AdaniawardBombayChallengingcontractcourtDharavihighIndiaLegalpleaProjectpropertiesredevelopmentRejects
Previous Post

Call for Papers: 2nd GNLU GCESCJ International Conference on Climate Justice and Sustainable Environment [March 21 – 23; Cash Prizes Worth Rs. 50k]: Submit Abstracts by Jan 20!

Next Post

Supreme Court Should Hear Case of Innocent Texas Woman Seeking Compensation After SWAT Team Destroyed Her Home – Law Blog

Related Posts

Supreme Court dismisses cable operator’s civil appeal against TDSAT order in favour of Zee – India Legal
Constitution

Supreme Court dismisses cable operator’s civil appeal against TDSAT order in favour of Zee – India Legal

July 23, 2025
No Exit: There’s Been Talk of Secession; Could It Occur Nowadays?
Constitution

No Exit: There’s Been Talk of Secession; Could It Occur Nowadays?

July 23, 2025
Decriminalising Abortion in England and Wales
Constitution

Decriminalising Abortion in England and Wales

July 21, 2025
Call For Submissions — European Law Blogger Prize 2025
Constitution

Call For Submissions — European Law Blogger Prize 2025

July 22, 2025
Van Mahotsav 2025: CJI BR Gavai stresses on importance of forests in reducing air pollution – India Legal
Constitution

Van Mahotsav 2025: CJI BR Gavai stresses on importance of forests in reducing air pollution – India Legal

July 20, 2025
Progressives and the Supreme Court
Constitution

Progressives and the Supreme Court

July 19, 2025
Next Post
Supreme Court Should Hear Case of Innocent Texas Woman Seeking Compensation After SWAT Team Destroyed Her Home – Law Blog

Supreme Court Should Hear Case of Innocent Texas Woman Seeking Compensation After SWAT Team Destroyed Her Home - Law Blog

Clock Ticking: Potential Government Shutdown on the Horizon | Customs & International Trade Law Blog

Clock Ticking: Potential Government Shutdown on the Horizon | Customs & International Trade Law Blog

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Justices take up disputes over terrorism damages suits and habeas filings – SCOTUSblog

Justices take up disputes over terrorism damages suits and habeas filings – SCOTUSblog

December 8, 2024
At Least Two Volunteer Church Staff Members Shot An Active Shooter and Stopped the Attack at Sunday Church Service

At Least Two Volunteer Church Staff Members Shot An Active Shooter and Stopped the Attack at Sunday Church Service

June 24, 2025
The Major Supreme Court Cases of 2024

The Major Supreme Court Cases of 2024

June 5, 2024
Allies struggle to work with US military in space operations, GAO finds

Allies struggle to work with US military in space operations, GAO finds

July 11, 2025
How Long Before Criminals Start Attacking Cops With Drones? | Crime in America.Net

How Long Before Criminals Start Attacking Cops With Drones? | Crime in America.Net

July 1, 2025
What are RAR days and do they work?

What are RAR days and do they work?

May 9, 2025
Who's Protecting Gamers From Cyberattacks

Who's Protecting Gamers From Cyberattacks

July 23, 2025
Supreme Court dismisses cable operator’s civil appeal against TDSAT order in favour of Zee – India Legal

Supreme Court dismisses cable operator’s civil appeal against TDSAT order in favour of Zee – India Legal

July 23, 2025
People recalled on IPP spend longer in prison

People recalled on IPP spend longer in prison

July 23, 2025
Musings on the Supreme Court’s Handling of its Emergency (“Shadow”) Docket, and Other, Related Procedural Shortcomings in the Court’s Work in the 2024-25 Term

Musings on the Supreme Court’s Handling of its Emergency (“Shadow”) Docket, and Other, Related Procedural Shortcomings in the Court’s Work in the 2024-25 Term

July 23, 2025
Man shot 8-year-old during road rage incident on Near South Side: officials

Man shot 8-year-old during road rage incident on Near South Side: officials

July 23, 2025
Top Biglaw Firm To Open An Office In Silicon Valley – Above the Law

Top Biglaw Firm To Open An Office In Silicon Valley – Above the Law

July 22, 2025
Law And Order News

Stay informed with Law and Order News, your go-to source for the latest updates and in-depth analysis on legal, law enforcement, and criminal justice topics. Join our engaged community of professionals and enthusiasts.

  • About Founder
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 Law And Order News.
Law And Order News is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Law and Legal
  • Military and Defense
  • International Conflict
  • Crimes
  • Constitution
  • Cyber Crimes

Copyright © 2024 Law And Order News.
Law And Order News is not responsible for the content of external sites.