Delhi High Court criticises Patanjali for misleading ‘Dhoka’ chyawanprash advertisement targeting rival brands – India Legal

The Delhi Excessive Courtroom has pulled up Patanjali Ayurved for airing an commercial selling its chyawanprash that appeared to discredit different manufacturers out there, together with Dabur India Restricted. The bench, comprising Justice Anish Dayal, questioned Patanjali’s messaging, notably the road suggesting that each one different chyawanprash merchandise had been “dhoka” (misleading), calling it deceptive and disparaging.

The case arose from a plea filed by Dabur India, alleging that Patanjali’s newest business for its chyawanprash implied that rival merchandise had been inferior or fraudulent. The advert featured Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna, with the tagline suggesting that “unusual chyawanprash” was ineffective in comparison with Patanjali’s product. The Courtroom noticed that such an commercial went past permissible comparative advertising and amounted to an assault on competitor credibility.

Throughout the listening to, the Courtroom famous that whereas firms are entitled to advertise their very own merchandise, they have to not defame or demean others in doing so. “How are you going to name everybody else ‘dhoka’? You’ll be able to’t counsel that others are dishonest customers simply because your product is completely different,” Justice Dayal remarked. The Courtroom highlighted that freedom of business speech doesn’t prolong to creating sweeping, unsubstantiated claims in opposition to opponents.

The bench additionally referenced earlier rulings on comparative promoting, affirming that an organization might emphasize the prevalence of its items however can not indicate that competing merchandise are substandard. It directed Patanjali to overview the content material of its business to make sure compliance with honest promoting practices and keep away from statements that will mislead the general public.

This improvement follows a collection of comparable instances between Dabur and Patanjali regarding product advertising and authenticity claims. The judgment reinforces that model rivalry in India’s FMCG sector should stay throughout the bounds of moral promoting, the place creativity and competitors coexist with out misinformation or market denigration.