On Friday morning’s The Nationwide Report on Newsmax, reporter Jason Mattera introduced a chunk highlighting proof that the mass shooter in Minneapolis selected to focus on a college partly as a result of it was a gun-free zone, citing the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart’s Dr. John Lott.
After recalling the reflexive demand for extra gun management by each journalists and Democrats, Mattera knowledgeable viewers of the hardly ever reported undeniable fact that mass shooters typically overtly admit of their manifestos that they selected to focus on a spot the place weapons had been banned as a result of it could be simpler to kill a lot of defenseless individuals. The reporter started:
Sure, progressives, proper out of the gate — Jacob Frey, Amy Klobuchar, members of the legacy media — they had been saying, “Skip the ideas and prayers — we want gun motion now.” However what if the way in which to cease these college massacres is to learn the killer’s personal phrases. Meaning have a look at their manifestos and see why they selected the targets.
Then got here a clip of Dr. Lott: “How far more specific can they be than saying they need to go to a spot the place their victims aren’t armed to allow them to go and kill extra individuals?”
The report then bought to the issue of the media hiding the reality from the general public:
MATTERA: John Lott on the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart says the why isn’t mysterious. Attackers just like the Minneapolis trans shooter decide straightforward marks the place they’ll run up a physique depend earlier than anybody can fireplace again.
LOTT: If the media even now and again would quote these elements of their manifestos and diaries, the complete gun management debate that we’ve got proper now could be dramatically completely different. Individuals could be specializing in eliminating the gun-free zones.
Mattera quickly associated that the Minneapolis killer wrote about the Aurora gunman from 2012 selecting a gun-free zone for his goal, after which admitted that he had chosen a college for a similar purpose:
As an example, in keeping with Lott, the Minneapolis trans killer wrote in his manifesto that the Aurora movie show shooter in 2012, quote, “might have chosen venues that had been gun-free zones. I in all probability intention the identical means,” including that he needs to make — needed to verify his victims could be unarmed. “That’s why I and others like faculties a lot.”
The piece went on to indicate a clip of Dr. Lott recalling proof that the hundreds of faculties that arm their employees by no means have any lethal shootings throughout college hours, which could be even be accessed on the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart’s web site. . . .
Brad Wilmouth, “Newsmax: Minneapolis Mass Shooter Was Drawn to Gun-Free Zone,” MRC Information Busters, September 2, 2025.
The day after a trans shooter opened fireplace on a Minneapolis Catholic college, Breitbart Information pointed to a Crime Prevention Analysis Heart (CPRC) report noting that the attacker sought out a gun-free zone on goal. In his manifesto, the trans shooter made clear he needed to assault a spot the place individuals could be “unarmed” as they had been when James Holmes attacked a gun-free movie show in Aurora, Colorado, in 2012. . . .
AWR Hawkins, “Thomas Massie Introduces Repeal of Gun-Free College Zones Act,” Breitbart, August 30, 2025.
A report from the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart (CPRC) issued Wednesday highlighted the Minneapolis trans shooter’s need to observe within the footsteps of mass shooters James Holmes and Adam Lanza by attacking unarmed individuals.
James Holmes is the gunman who opened fireplace in a gun-free movie show in Aurora, Colorado, on July 20, 2012, killing 12 and injuring dozens. Adam Lanza carried out the Sandy Hook Elementary College capturing on December 14, 2012, in Newtown, Connecticut, killing 28 individuals together with himself and injuring two others.
CPRC used its report show that the trans attacker who allegedly shot and killed two kids at Annunciation Catholic college and wounded many others needed gun-free victims, like those Holmes and Lanza shot. . . .
AWR Hawkins, “Report: Trans Shooter Focused Gun-Free College As a result of He Wished Victims Who Had been Unarmed,” Breitbart, August 28, 2025.
There may be vastly extra violent crime being reported now than when the infant boomers had been reaching maturity, and there’s good purpose to consider that the extensively quoted FBI numbers have been more and more undercounted for a minimum of 20 years, as John Lott and his staff on the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart have documented: . . .
S.T. Karnick, “Life, Liberty, Property #114: Fiat Cash and the Phony Housing Growth,” The Heartland Institute, August 26, 2025.
John Lott Jr. (1998) empirically demonstrates that elevated authorized gun possession is correlated with lowered crime. . . . United States: Elevated authorized gun possession correlated with decreased crime (Lott Jr., 1998). . . . Legally owned weapons should not an emblem of violence, however of respectable resistance to state failure. Civilian disarmament, by concentrating on solely sincere residents, proves to be an ineffective and unfair public coverage. As John Lott Jr. acknowledged: “Crime doesn’t lower when residents are disarmed. It merely modifications targets.”
John Lott Jr. (1998) demonstra empiricamente que o aumento da posse authorized de armas está correlacionado à redução da criminalidade. . . . Estados Unidos: aumento da posse authorized de armas correlacionado à queda da criminalidade (Lott Jr., 1998). . . .A arma authorized não é símbolo de violência, mas de resistência legítima à falência estatal. O desarmamento civil, ao atingir apenas os cidadãos honestos, revela-se uma política pública ineficaz e injusta. Como afirmou John Lott Jr.: “A criminalidade não diminui quando se desarma o cidadão. Ela apenas muda de alvo.” . . . LOTT JR., John R. Extra Weapons, Much less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Management Legal guidelines. Chicago: College of Chicago Press, 1998. . . .
Jorge Luiz Bezerra, “A incoerência do desarmamento: Entre a vontade fashionable e a leniência estatal,” Alagoas Governo, September 1, 2025.
Dr. John Lott and Rep. Thomas Massie acknowledge a actuality that blood-dancing Democrats don’t need Individuals to be uncovered to.
“An Inconvenient Fact,” The Battle on Weapons, August 29, 2025.
Earlier this yr, the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart revealed a report difficult the favored anti-gunner delusion that armed civilians don’t cease lively shooters. Researchers analyzed 512 lively shooter incidents between 2014 and 2023, exhibiting {that a} “good man with a gun” had been simpler at stopping would-be mass shooters than members of regulation enforcement.
The research revealed that “in keeping with police, armed residents have stopped 57 lively shooter occasions which in any other case had been prone to have escalated into mass public shootings” and that “armed residents cut back the variety of individuals killed by 49 % whereas police improve the quantity killed by 16 %.”
That is largely as a result of an armed particular person who’s already on the scene of an lively shooter incident have extra alternatives to cease the assailant. Conversely, police can not act in opposition to an lively shooter till they arrive on scene. Inside that time frame, an lively shooter can declare important numbers of casualties earlier than they’re stopped.
The reality is that having extra accountable gun house owners round can save way more lives than gun management legal guidelines geared toward making it tougher for these people to arm themselves. Research after research has proven that gun house owners are extra possible to make use of their firearms to guard themselves or others than to commit against the law. It’s an inconvenient truth for anti-gunners. Nevertheless, it is among the solely practical methods to guard the lives of schoolchildren. . . .
Jeff Charles, “Whereas Democrats Exploit College Capturing Victims, Thomas Massie Simply Provided a Actual Answer,” Townhall, August 30, 2025.
Within the wake of the capturing on the Church of the Annunciation, although, that may hopefully change. As Dr. John Lott identified in a publish at Crime Prevention Analysis Heart’s web site, the killer particularly mentioned he needed to focus on a gun-free zone since there could be much less probability of an armed response, chillingly writing “That’s why I and lots of others like faculties a lot.”
Lott has offered sturdy proof that the monsters who interact in some of these assaults typically hunt down locations the place their victims are unlikely to be armed, and analysis from Purdue College’s Homeland Safety Institute means that the quickest method to cease an lively assailant assault at a college is to have each a college useful resource workplace readily available who can hunt down and have interaction the attacker, together with armed academics who can shelter in place with their college students and defend them in case the killer breaches the classroom door. . . .
Cam Edwards, “Minneapolis Shooter Sought Out ‘Gun-Free Zone’ as Location for Assault,” August 29, 2025.
In truth, Dr. John Lott, president of the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart (CPRC), has been explaining for years that many mass murderers deliberately gravitate towards so-called “gun-free” zones as a result of they know they trigger most harm with out being confronted by somebody with a firearm.
“They know in the event that they go to a spot the place their victims are defenseless, they’re going to have the ability to go and kill extra individuals and get extra media consideration,” Lott just lately informed Fox Information. . . .
Mark Chesnut, “Minneapolis Assassin Demonstrated But Once more The Fallacy Of Gun-Free Zones,” The Fact about Weapons, September 3, 2025.
