Chicago Woman Indicted Despite Claims She Was Shot by a Federal Agent – Law Blog

Marimar Martinez was charged on October 5, 2025, with assaulting a federal officer with a lethal or harmful weapon after she adopted a car pushed by border patrol brokers along with her automotive within the Brighton Park neighborhood on Chicago‘s Southwest Facet.

In keeping with the legal criticism, prosecutors declare Martinez was driving as a part of a “convoy” that was following brokers for about half-hour, disobeying visitors alerts, and driving “aggressively” to chase the federal autos. As she drove, Martinez was broadcasting on Fb Reside. She was allegedly sounding her horn and following the autos.

Martinez’s legal professionals declare physique digicam video reveals an agent turning his car into Martinez’s car. After the affect, the agent within the video yells aggressively whereas utilizing profanity at Martinez. The agent then leaves his car and fires a number of rounds at Martinez. The Division of Justice has not denied that Martinez was shot a number of instances by the officer. 

After the taking pictures, Martinez drove herself to a close-by store. The supervisor known as 911 whereas Martinez was bleeding on the chair. She was taken to the hospital by ambulance. She was bleeding so profusely that brokers had been pressured to attend to take her into custody whereas docs handled her.

U.S. District Choose Heather McShain denied a request by the federal authorities to detain Martinez and Anthony Ian Santos Ruiz, 21, pending trial. The choose cited Martinez’s lack of legal historical past and in depth household and group ties as compelling causes to launch her pending trial.

Is It Unlawful to Comply with a Police Automotive?

There are two conditions the place “following” a police automotive may be a problem. First, if one is merely drivingon the identical road and/or in the identical route because the police automotive. There isn’t a intent to observe the police automotive, only a coincidence. This is completely authorized, and never even a “grey space.”

The second state of affairs is one the place Ms. Martinez was concerned. Ms. Martinez and several other others had been following border patrol brokers with the intent to report them and warn others about their location. Most jurisdictions would not have legal guidelines towards following a police officer, and lots of jurisdictions, below the First Modification, will shield the precise to report an officer.

Warning different those that regulation enforcement brokers are approaching is a “grey space.” Some jurisdictions have decided that warning others could also be constitutionally protected speech. Nevertheless, a prosecutor might interpret that warning as obstruction of justice since that warning could possibly be used to hide data or evid

ence of lawbreaking.

For regulation enforcement, an unknown car following them, whereas not unlawful, could possibly be threatening. No person needs to be adopted or stalked, as there could possibly be an imminent risk to their security. Regulation enforcement officers are normally armed, however they will nonetheless be the targets of gangs and different criminals. Nevertheless, the general public arguably have a proper to observe regulation enforcement since regulation enforcement is meant to work for the general public. Though following a police automotive isn’t unlawful, it’s probably a foul thought since it might trigger regulation enforcement officers to turn out to be suspicious of why they’re being adopted.

What Occurs If the Allegations are Contradicted by the Proof?

The precise cost towards Martinez and one different was for:

“forcibly assaulted, resisted, opposed, impeded, intimidated, and interfered with an individual designated in Title 18, United States Code, Part 1114, specifically an officer and worker of the US, whereas he was engaged within the efficiency of his official duties, and within the fee of such acts used a lethal and harmful weapon.”

The “lethal and harmful weapon” on this cost was presumably Martinez’s car. Though Martinez had a gun along with her through the incident, it isn’t disputed that she remained in her car the entire time, the gun was allegedly nonetheless in her purse, and Martinez has a hid weapons allow.

The officer’s taking pictures was allegedly self-defense on the a part of the officers. Martinez’s attorneys declare there may be physique cam footage exhibiting the alternative: the officer rammed her car after which proceeded to shoot her whereas she was nonetheless inside her car. If it had been solely Martinez’s phrase towards the officers, a jury would decide who’s credible.

The optics of the state of affairs are very poor for the federal authorities to say self-defense on the a part of the officer. First, Martinez is an unarmed lady towards a male officer brandishing a firearm. Second, Martinez was the one who was severely injured; there isn’t any allegation that the officer sustained any accidents.

Nevertheless, the physique cam footage would doubtless change the burden of the proof. It might not be Martinez versus the officer’s phrase, however there can be substantial proof supporting one facet or one other.

Furthermore, different components would doubtless weaken the fees towards Martinez. As said earlier, it’s not unlawful in and of itself to observe or report regulation enforcement. Even warning others of regulation enforcement coming could also be thought-about protected speech. If Martinez’s legal professionals are appropriate and Martinez was nonetheless in her car, then there may be even much less cause for the officer to shoot her.

Do I Want a Legal Protection Lawyer?

A legal protection legal professional might help you construct your case and signify you throughout all of the phases of a homicide or manslaughter trial. The emotional advantages embrace some sense of aid that your legal professional is in your facet.