Tuesday, July 29, 2025
Law And Order News
  • Home
  • Law and Legal
  • Military and Defense
  • International Conflict
  • Crimes
  • Constitution
  • Cyber Crimes
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Law and Legal
  • Military and Defense
  • International Conflict
  • Crimes
  • Constitution
  • Cyber Crimes
No Result
View All Result
Law And Order News
No Result
View All Result
Home Constitution

Bilkis Bano case: Supreme Court dismisses plea challenging adverse remarks against Gujarat government – India Legal

Bilkis Bano case: Supreme Court dismisses plea challenging adverse remarks against Gujarat government – India Legal


The Supreme Courtroom has dismissed a evaluation petition filed by the State of Gujarat difficult the remarks made by the Apex Courtroom towards it, whereas setting apart the untimely launch of 11 convicts within the Bilkis Bano case.

The Bench of Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan additional dismissed the evaluation petitions filed by the convicts.

The Apex Courtroom recorded in its order that after going by means of the evaluation petitions, the order underneath problem and the papers annexed therewith, it was happy that there was no error obvious on the face of the document or any benefit within the evaluation petitions, warranting reconsideration of the impugned verdict.

The Apex Courtroom had come down closely on the Gujarat authorities, whereas setting apart the remission of 11 convicts within the Bilkis Bano case in January this 12 months.

The highest courtroom of the nation noticed that the State of Gujarat had acted in tandem with the convict who moved the Bench in search of a course for the consideration of his untimely launch utility.

In Might 2022, whereas listening to the writ petition of one of many convicts, the Apex Courtroom had dominated that the State of Gujarat was the suitable authorities to think about the remission plea. This led to a sequence of occasions that finally resulted within the launch of all 11 convicts.

All of the 11 convicts had been sentenced to life imprisonment for a number of murders and gangrapes in the course of the 2002 communal riots in Gujarat.

They had been launched by the Gujarat authorities in August 2022, on Independence Day. Subsequently, the Supreme Courtroom dominated in favour of Bilkis Bano and allowed her writ petition assailing the remission. The Bench held that the State of Gujarat was not the ‘applicable authorities’ to determine their remission pleas inside the which means of Part 432 of the CrPC, because the trial had been transferred to Maharashtra.

In its evaluation petition, the federal government of Gujarat claimed that it acted in accordance with the Supreme Courtroom’s course from Might 2022. The State contended that it couldn’t be accused of “usurping” jurisdiction from the State of Maharashtra, because it was appearing as per the Courtroom’s order.

The Gujarat authorities additional argued that it had persistently maintained earlier than the Apex Courtroom that Maharashtra was the suitable authorities to deal with the remission pleas underneath the CrPC.

It claimed that the extreme remarks handed by the highest courtroom of the nation, suggesting the state acted “in tandem” with one of many convicts, had been unwarranted and prejudicial.

Bilkis Bano case: Supreme Courtroom dismisses plea difficult antagonistic remarks towards Gujarat authorities

The Supreme Courtroom has dismissed a evaluation petition filed by the State of Gujarat difficult the remarks made by the Apex Courtroom towards it, whereas setting apart the untimely launch of 11 convicts within the Bilkis Bano case.

The Bench of Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan additional dismissed the evaluation petitions filed by the convicts.

The Apex Courtroom recorded in its order that after going by means of the evaluation petitions, the order underneath problem and the papers annexed therewith, it was happy that there was no error obvious on the face of the document or any benefit within the evaluation petitions, warranting reconsideration of the impugned verdict.

The Apex Courtroom had come down closely on the Gujarat authorities, whereas setting apart the remission of 11 convicts within the Bilkis Bano case in January this 12 months.

The highest courtroom of the nation noticed that the State of Gujarat had acted in tandem with the convict who moved the Bench in search of a course for the consideration of his untimely launch utility.

In Might 2022, whereas listening to the writ petition of one of many convicts, the Apex Courtroom had dominated that the State of Gujarat was the suitable authorities to think about the remission plea. This led to a sequence of occasions that finally resulted within the launch of all 11 convicts.

All of the 11 convicts had been sentenced to life imprisonment for a number of murders and gangrapes in the course of the 2002 communal riots in Gujarat.

They had been launched by the Gujarat authorities in August 2022, on Independence Day. Subsequently, the Supreme Courtroom dominated in favour of Bilkis Bano and allowed her writ petition assailing the remission. The Bench held that the State of Gujarat was not the ‘applicable authorities’ to determine their remission pleas inside the which means of Part 432 of the CrPC, because the trial had been transferred to Maharashtra.

In its evaluation petition, the federal government of Gujarat claimed that it acted in accordance with the Supreme Courtroom’s course from Might 2022. The State contended that it couldn’t be accused of “usurping” jurisdiction from the State of Maharashtra, because it was appearing as per the Courtroom’s order.

The Gujarat authorities additional argued that it had persistently maintained earlier than the Apex Courtroom that Maharashtra was the suitable authorities to deal with the remission pleas underneath the CrPC.

It claimed that the extreme remarks handed by the highest courtroom of the nation, suggesting the state acted “in tandem” with one of many convicts, had been unwarranted and prejudicial.



Source link

Tags: adverseBanoBilkisCaseChallengingcourtdismissesGovernmentGujaratIndiaLegalplearemarksSupreme
Previous Post

Webinar on POSH Regulations by National Judicial Reforms Council [October 11; 5 pm]: Register by October 10!

Next Post

Ukraine recap: Putin’s nuclear sabre-rattling becomes more ominous

Related Posts

International Rulings and the UK–Mauritius Chagos Agreement
Constitution

International Rulings and the UK–Mauritius Chagos Agreement

July 27, 2025
Cash-at-home row: Supreme Court to hear Justice Yashwant Varma plea against indictment on July 28 – India Legal
Constitution

Cash-at-home row: Supreme Court to hear Justice Yashwant Varma plea against indictment on July 28 – India Legal

July 26, 2025
The government’s proposed standards reforms are a promising start, but there should be more to come
Constitution

The government’s proposed standards reforms are a promising start, but there should be more to come

July 25, 2025
Sterbehilfe endlich regeln
Constitution

Sterbehilfe endlich regeln

July 24, 2025
Reviewing the Modernisation Committee’s first year 
Constitution

Reviewing the Modernisation Committee’s first year 

July 28, 2025
Supreme Court dismisses cable operator’s civil appeal against TDSAT order in favour of Zee – India Legal
Constitution

Supreme Court dismisses cable operator’s civil appeal against TDSAT order in favour of Zee – India Legal

July 23, 2025
Next Post
Ukraine recap: Putin’s nuclear sabre-rattling becomes more ominous

Ukraine recap: Putin’s nuclear sabre-rattling becomes more ominous

Annual Report from the North Carolina Judicial College (2023-2024) – North Carolina Criminal Law

Annual Report from the North Carolina Judicial College (2023-2024) – North Carolina Criminal Law

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Justices take up disputes over terrorism damages suits and habeas filings – SCOTUSblog

Justices take up disputes over terrorism damages suits and habeas filings – SCOTUSblog

December 8, 2024
The Major Supreme Court Cases of 2024

The Major Supreme Court Cases of 2024

June 5, 2024
How Long Before Criminals Start Attacking Cops With Drones? | Crime in America.Net

How Long Before Criminals Start Attacking Cops With Drones? | Crime in America.Net

July 1, 2025
What are RAR days and do they work?

What are RAR days and do they work?

May 9, 2025
Charges filed in 'savage and random' stabbing on CTA platform

Charges filed in 'savage and random' stabbing on CTA platform

July 10, 2025
At Least Two Volunteer Church Staff Members Shot An Active Shooter and Stopped the Attack at Sunday Church Service

At Least Two Volunteer Church Staff Members Shot An Active Shooter and Stopped the Attack at Sunday Church Service

June 24, 2025
Top Law Firm Business Intelligence Software in 2025

Top Law Firm Business Intelligence Software in 2025

July 29, 2025
Trump Wants to Force Unhoused People into Hospitals. ‘It’s Entirely Misguided.’

Trump Wants to Force Unhoused People into Hospitals. ‘It’s Entirely Misguided.’

July 29, 2025
Latest Data On Homicides From The USDOJ and JAMA | Crime in America.Net

Latest Data On Homicides From The USDOJ and JAMA | Crime in America.Net

July 28, 2025
Hydrogen Utopia International (LON:HUI) Trading Up 15.5%  – Should You Buy?

Hydrogen Utopia International (LON:HUI) Trading Up 15.5% – Should You Buy?

July 29, 2025
Centre Clears ₹29,558 Crore For Indigenous Defence Technology Development

Centre Clears ₹29,558 Crore For Indigenous Defence Technology Development

July 28, 2025
The Current Status of Non-Compete Agreements: It’s Complicated

The Current Status of Non-Compete Agreements: It’s Complicated

July 28, 2025
Law And Order News

Stay informed with Law and Order News, your go-to source for the latest updates and in-depth analysis on legal, law enforcement, and criminal justice topics. Join our engaged community of professionals and enthusiasts.

  • About Founder
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 Law And Order News.
Law And Order News is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Law and Legal
  • Military and Defense
  • International Conflict
  • Crimes
  • Constitution
  • Cyber Crimes

Copyright © 2024 Law And Order News.
Law And Order News is not responsible for the content of external sites.