That is an interview that Dr. John Lott did whereas he was in Argentina.
.
Famend American economist John Lott granted us an unique interview after his presentation the day gone by to a choose group of attendees at a downtown lodge in Buenos Aires. This occasion was organized by the Argentine Federation of Reliable Gun Customers (FLUAA), which hosted the distinguished safety specialist.For these unfamiliar with him, Dr. Lott is a professor with a Grasp’s diploma in Economics from the US, who’s intently associated to our gun setting via his influential research on crime and armed protection amongst civilian and police customers. His statistics verify the necessity for many who are in a position and prepared to legally arm themselves to take action as a way of enhancing their private safety. Under is an excerpt from the interview.
.
Hernán Rodríguez: Are you dedicated to defending the rights to make use of and bear arms?John Lott: No, I’m not concerned with these rights. What I do is attempt to set up what makes folks safer. And I got here to this unintentionally. I used to be instructing a category on the Wharton Faculty of Enterprise in Pennsylvania on company and white-collar crime, and I made the error of telling the scholars we had been forward of schedule. After class, a few them got here as much as me and mentioned, “Effectively, as you understand, we’re forward of schedule and have further time, and though it’s not precisely a subject on the syllabus, your presentation is expounded to crime. Would you be focused on giving a chat on gun management?” To which I replied, “Effectively, I assume I can.”
.Previous to this, Lott had finished an in-depth examine of crime, however he by no means discovered himself focused on weapons. It was then that he started to look extra deeply into the topic. That’s, “I learn some native newspapers,” he continues, “however I used to be shocked by how poorly all of the analysis work that had been finished was finished. And when you’re an instructional, you do analysis for considered one of two attainable causes: both you’ve gotten a brand new concept that nobody has had earlier than, which constitutes 95% of what I’ve finished; otherwise you assume you are able to do a greater job than another person has.”
.H.R.: Look… that is my final carry allow, already expired. In Argentina at the moment, they’re solely issued to sure politicians and well-connected folks (aside from some firms). It’s unimaginable for the typical person to acquire one from them. What’s your opinion on reputable carry?
.J.L.: What my analysis signifies is that there are mainly two teams of the inhabitants who would profit most from having carry permits. First, poor minorities residing in city environments with excessive crime charges. Second, people who find themselves bodily weaker, equivalent to girls and the aged. And also you inform me it’s very tough? The poor won’t ever have the ability to carry a gun. Nonetheless, there’s a sure section of society that advantages. Ought to I be pleased that highly effective, rich, and politically linked folks can get hold of these permits and get round? Sure, that’s fantastic, however they’re not those who face essentially the most crime. And you understand what? You take a look at crime charges in Argentina, and so they’re somewhat decrease than within the U.S. Alternatively, the theft fee is solely unimaginable. I imply, in line with the numbers I discovered, in your nation it’s near 1,068 per 100,000 inhabitants. And within the U.S., it’s 60 based mostly on the identical variety of folks. There, we now have what we name the Nationwide Crime Victimization Statistics, which collects knowledge on 240,000 folks a yr. So, we now have an concept of the speed of crimes not reported to the police. In Argentina, they don’t have something like that.
.
H.R.: It’s simply that not all victims report crimes…
.J.L.: Appropriate. One of many belongings you uncover over time is that if folks don’t consider crimes will probably be solved, they’re much less prone to report them. And my guess is that your crime fee, the actual one, is definitely a lot larger than 1,068, which is staggering. I strongly suspect that if Argentina had a statistics service like ours, it could know that the variety of unreported crimes can be even larger than in my nation. And that the speed of property crime could be very excessive all through the nation. We had been driving round Buenos Aires and we noticed bars even on condo buildings. It is because owners concern criminals climbing via balconies. Effectively, all this will fluctuate relying on whether or not persons are allowed to personal weapons or not.
.H.R.: I agree. We frequently have unhealthy officers who attempt to abolish gun possession, not subject gun permits. After I had it, I used to be saved thrice just by drawing my weapon. The criminals fled, with none photographs being fired.
.J.L.: Effectively, People clear up 95% of tried robberies on this defensive method, by drawing their weapons. Look, criminals aren’t silly, not that silly. They don’t wish to make the crime too tough or dangerous for themselves. It is a fundamental level; it’s not rocket science. If you wish to cease crime, it’s important to make it dangerous for the criminals. And you are able to do that with larger arrest charges, with harsher penalties, longer sentences, the dying penalty, in fact, and going to extremes. However you can even obtain it by making it attainable for the victims of those crimes to defend themselves. That helps so much and has been confirmed in lots of international locations around the globe.
Hernán Rodríguez, “Entrevista al especialista en seguridad John Lott: “El delito baja si las víctimas pueden defenderse”,” Weekend, September 29, 2025.



















![Internship Opportunity at Rashtriya Raksha University, Gandhinagar [Online; Multiple Roles]: Apply Now!](https://i2.wp.com/cdn.lawctopus.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/efsl-post-1-1.jpeg?w=120&resize=120,86&ssl=1)