A current op-ed by economist and gun activist John Lott for the Every day Caller recommended the Biden-Harris Administration has enabled crime spikes by way of their open border insurance policies, and the fact of its affect may very well be worse than reported. Consultant Kat Cammack (R-FL) mentioned the article in a current look on Fox Information’s Faulkner Focus, viciously condemning the White Home, saying, “They let Individuals die, and their blood is on their palms.”
Lott’s article famous that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) knowledge from July 2024 reveals that 7.5 million unlawful aliens have been launched into america up to now 4 a long time, together with over 600,000 with prison data as revealed in October.
“ICE has been processing criminals as they enter the nation, however with out figuring out them as criminals. So, underneath the Biden administration, they’ve merely been launched into the nation. Now, they’re strolling freely in america, and nobody is aware of the place they’re. As unhealthy as these numbers are, the fact could also be even worse,” Lott’s piece mentioned ominously. . . .
GRAYSON BAKICH, “Cammack Accuses Biden of ‘Letting Individuals Die’ from Border, Fentanyl Disaster,” The Floridian Press, DECEMBER 3, 2024.
In den USA tobt – wie auch in Europa – seit vielen Jahren ein Streit zwischen Befürwortern einer liberalen Waffengesetzgebung und den Vertretern einer rigorosen Beschränkung des privaten Waffenbesitzes.
Einer der prominentesten Vertreter der ersten Gruppe ist der Ökonom und Waffenrechtsaktivist John Lott. In seinen Büchern „Extra Weapons, Much less Crime“ und „The Bias In opposition to Weapons“ argumentiert er für einen möglichst freien Zugang der Bürger zu effektiven Selbstverteidigungsmitteln. Lott und andere sachverständige liberale Autoren betonen den abschreckenden Effekt, den der bewaffnete Bürger auf kriminelle Gewalttäter ausübt.
Demnach würde von der Möglichkeit, dass potenzielle Straftäter sich unverhofft einem bewaffneten Opfer gegenüberzusehen, eine gewaltpräventive Wirkung ausgehen.
Lott hat herausgefunden, dass das zu einer Verlagerung von Gewaltkriminalität aus Bundesstaaten mit liberaler Waffengesetzgebung in solche mit restriktiven Regeln führt – was seine These unterstützt, dass Verbrecher nicht auf Schießereien, sondern auf wehrlose Opfer aus sind.
Gegner eines freien Zugangs zu Feuerwaffen behaupten dagegen, dass jede Reduktion des Privatwaffenbestandes automatisch zu einem Rückgang der Schusswaffenkriminalität führen muss, wobei sie grundsätzlich nicht zwischen authorized oder unlawful erworbenen Schusswaffen unterscheiden. Dass Kriminelle nicht dazu neigen, ihre Tatmittel auf amtsbekannten Wegen – beim gewerblichen Waffenfachhandel – zu erwerben, sondern den (naturgemäß unregulierten) Schwarzmarkt vorziehen, bleibt unberücksichtigt.
Tatsache ist, dass in den USA Schusswaffen in der Kriminalitätsstatistik eine größere Rolle spielen als in Europa. Daraus den Schluss zu ziehen, dass strikte Waffengesetze zu mehr Sicherheit führen würden, greift jedoch zu kurz. Für die Gewaltkriminalität sind nämlich sozioökonomische Faktoren wie Arbeitslosigkeit, Drogenabhängigkeit oder Alkoholismus von wesentlich größerer Bedeutung als der freie Zugang zu Feuerwaffen.
Zu denken gibt in diesem Zusammenhang das Beispiel Großbritanniens, wo 1987, nach einem Schulmassaker im schottischen Dunblane, der non-public Schusswaffenbesitz beinahe ausnahmslos kriminalisiert wurde, was sich auf die Zahl der Gewaltdelikte indes nicht in gewünschter Weise auswirkte.
In den USA fallen die Waffengesetze nicht in die Bundeszuständigkeit, sondern sind Sache der Bundesstaten, wobei die Regeln stark voneinander abweichen. Vergleichende Studien zur Frage des Zusammenhangs zwischen der legalen Verfügbarkeit von Feuerwaffen und der Zahl der Schusswaffendelikte zeigen keine klare Korrelation. . . .
Employees, “Freiheit oder vermeintliche Sicherheit? Oder: Fakten und Logik versus Emotionen,” Eigentumlich Frei, December 1, 2024.
Translation
Within the USA – as in Europe – a dispute has been raging for a few years between supporters of liberal gun legal guidelines and those that advocate strict restrictions on non-public gun possession.One of the outstanding representatives of the primary group is the economist and gun rights activist John Lott. In his books “Extra Weapons, Much less Crime” and “The Bias In opposition to Weapons” he argues for residents to have as a lot free entry as potential to efficient technique of self-defense. Lott and different skilled liberal authors emphasize the deterrent impact that armed residents have on violent criminals.Accordingly, the chance that potential criminals unexpectedly come nose to nose with an armed sufferer would have a violence-preventing impact.Lott has discovered that this results in a shift in violent crime from states with liberal gun legal guidelines to these with restrictive guidelines – which helps his thesis that criminals are usually not after shootings, however defenseless victims.Opponents of free entry to firearms, alternatively, declare that any discount in non-public gun possession should mechanically result in a discount in gun crime, though they don’t basically differentiate between legally and illegally acquired firearms. The truth that criminals don’t have a tendency to accumulate their technique of crime by way of formally recognized channels – from industrial gun sellers – however favor the (naturally unregulated) black market is just not taken into consideration.The very fact is that firearms play a bigger position in crime statistics within the USA than in Europe. Nevertheless, it’s too simplistic to conclude from this that strict gun legal guidelines would result in higher safety. Socioeconomic components comparable to unemployment, drug habit or alcoholism are of a lot higher significance for violent crime than free entry to firearms.On this context, the instance of Nice Britain is value contemplating. In 1987, after a faculty bloodbath in Dunblane, Scotland, non-public possession of firearms was criminalized virtually with out exception, though this didn’t have the specified impact on the variety of violent crimes.Within the USA, gun legal guidelines are usually not a federal matter, however are a matter for the states, with the foundations various significantly. Comparative research on the query of the connection between the authorized availability of firearms and the variety of firearm crimes present no clear correlation.
Individuals discovered shortly earlier than the elections that, as John Lott reported at RealClearInvestigations, the long-running Democratic declare that crime in America had dropped precipitously with Joe Biden (nominally) in cost was a falsehood. The FBI’s 2022 knowledge indicating a 2.1% drop in violent crime was quietly revised to indicate an increase of 4.5%. “The up to date knowledge for 2022 report that there have been 80,029 extra violent crimes than in 2021. There have been a further 1,699 murders, 7,780 rapes, 33,459 robberies, and 37,091 aggravated assaults.” . . .
David P. Deavel, “Daniel Penny Is On Trial, However So Are Blue States,” AMAC, December 8, 2024.
From Could 2007 to January 2024, 1,007 killings throughout almost 16 years is a mean of about 63 killings per yr. To place that determine in its correct context, you need to evaluate it to the variety of Individuals who lawfully carry firearms. In line with knowledge from the College of Washington, “in 2019 roughly 16 million grownup handgun homeowners had carried a loaded handgun on their particular person up to now month.” In line with the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart, the quantity has risen to 22 million as of 2022. . . .
Kostas Moros, “Information Proves Conclusively That These Who Carry Firearms Nearly By no means Commit Crimes,” American Liberty, December 4, 2024.
The price of crime from 662,000 prison unlawful migrants searched for deportation has been pegged at 3 times the much-hyped worth of President-elect Donald Trump’s “mass deportation” plan.
In an evaluation from the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart, the prices of crime from the highest targets of ICE Enforcement and Removing Operations was set at $166.5 billion. That quantity relies on the price to victims, a worth record developed by the Nationwide Institute of Justice. . . .
Paul Bedard, “Unlawful migrant crime price $166.5 billion, one-third the value of deportation,” MSN, November 27, 2024.
The $166.5 billion determine, derived from knowledge from Dr. John R. Lott and RealClear Investigations, is probably going a lowball estimate. It considers solely a fraction of the crimes dedicated by 662,566 non-detained unlawful immigrants with prison histories—criminals launched into the U.S. on the flimsy hope they’ll present up for hearings. What concerning the untold crimes by the estimated two million “gotaways” who entered the U.S. since 2021, escaping even rudimentary scrutiny? . . .
Tree Regulation, “Unlawful Alien Crimes Price U.S. Victims $166.5 Billion – And Rising,” Ammoland, December 6, 2024.
Mark Penn is “one very trustworthy man,” declared economist and gun rights advocate John R. Lott, Jr. . . .
JOSHUA KLEIN, “Former Clinton Advisor Blasts Hunter’s ‘Disgraceful’ Pardon, Says Actual Purpose to Protect Biden’s Household ‘Scheme’,” Breitbart, Dec 3, 2024
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) faces mounting scrutiny after revelations of in depth and unexplained revisions to its crime statistics. In October, Dr. John Lott of the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart uncovered that the FBI had stealth-edited its 2022 violent crime report, turning an preliminary 2.1% lower right into a 4.5% improve—an adjustment that added 1,699 murders.
“How do you miss 1,699 murders?” Lott requested, calling the revisions each alarming and indicative of deeper points within the company’s dealing with of public knowledge. . . .
This isn’t the primary time the FBI has confronted allegations of mishandling knowledge. Lott beforehand criticized the company for omitting quite a few circumstances of defensive gun use from its stories. “The FBI dataset is lacking so many defensive gun makes use of that it’s onerous to imagine it isn’t intentional,” he mentioned. “And so they refuse to appropriate blatant errors.” . . .
Sean Gibbons, “The FBI’s Lacking Murders,” The Gun Experiment, December 4, 2024.
Trošak kriminalnih aktivnosti koje su počinili ilegalni migranti, koji se nalaze na listi za deportaciju, procenjuje se na 166,5 milijardi dolara, što je tri puta više od ukupnog troška planirane masovne deportacije, koju je predložio novoizabrani predsednik Donald Tramp
Taj iznos temelji se na analizi koju je uradio Centar za prevenciju kriminala (Crime Prevention Analysis Heart), a koji je uključivao samo troškove vezane za zločine koji su počinili 662.000 ilegalnih migranata koje su američke imigracione službe (ICE) htele da deportuju, piše portal “Vašington egzaminer”
Prema analizi koju je uradio Centar, ubistva čine gotovo 153,8 milijardi dolara od ukupnog iznosa, dok seksualni napadi i prekršaji čine dodatnih šest milijardi dolara, a seksualni zločini i prekršaji još 5,2 milijarde dolara. . . .
Employees, “Trošak kriminala koji su počinili ilegalni migranti u SAD 166 milijardi dolara,” Политика, November 29, 2024.
Translation from Bosnian.
The price of prison exercise dedicated by unlawful immigrants on the deportation record is estimated at $166.5 billion, 3 times the overall price of the deliberate mass deportations proposed by President-elect Donald Trump
That determine relies on an evaluation by the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart that included solely the prices associated to crimes dedicated by the 662,000 unlawful immigrants that the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) needed to deport, the Washington Examiner stories.
In line with the evaluation by the Heart, homicides account for almost $153.8 billion of the overall, whereas sexual assaults and misdemeanors account for a further $6 billion, and sexual crimes and misdemeanors account for one more $5.2 billion.
