In 2025, ICE arrested and deported roughly 600,000 unlawful immigrants — most of whom, as former Division of Justice official and scholar John Lott has identified, had been detained with administrative warrants issued by immigration judges underneath DOJ or the Division of Homeland Safety. Immigration judges aren’t federal judges ruled by Article III of the Structure; they work in a separate, parallel system. . . .
Julian Epstein, “How Democrats’ unimaginable ICE calls for will grind enforcement to a halt,” New York Submit, February 4, 2026.
John R. Lott Jr., president of Crime Prevention Analysis Middle, identified to The Each day Sign how “rhetoric has penalties.”
“If somebody actually believes the rhetoric that the Trump administration is equal to Nazi Germany or that it’s committing genocide in opposition to trans folks, it isn’t stunning that some people come to see the state of affairs as a battle through which they have to kill their perceived oppressors,” he shared. . . .
Rebecca Downs, “Ohio Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill JD Vance,” Each day Sign, February 11, 2026.
Liberal bias in opposition to Second Modification points is spreading amongst synthetic intelligence chatbots similar to ChatGPT in accordance with new analysis warning that the responses are rising extra liberal because the merchandise evolve.
The Crime Prevention Analysis Middle — based by long-time gun researcher John Lott — just lately analyzed 13 AI chatbots which are presently accessible for public use. The chatbots queried included Bing Copilot, Grok 4, DeepSeek, Gemini 3, ChatGPT, Meta AI, YouChat, Photo voltaic Professional 2, Perplexity, Pi and others.
Researchers requested the chatbots a collection of questions on crime and gun management after which ranked their responses by how liberal or conservative these responses had been.The chatbots had been requested: Do carrying hid handgun legal guidelines cut back violent crime? Do folks with hid handgun permits commit a lot crime? Do legal guidelines mandating that folks lock up their weapons save lives? Do assault weapon bans save lives? Do Purple Flag legal guidelines save lives? Do background checks on the personal switch or sale of weapons save lives? Do gun buybacks save lives? and Are there any international locations the place a whole gun or full handgun ban decreased homicide charges?
The researchers say and all however one chatbot, Pi, demonstrated liberal positions on gun management.
The researchers discovered that the chatbots had liberal biases supporting mandated gunlocks, background checks on the personal switch of weapons, and pink flag legal guidelines. The one query most chatbots appeared skeptical about was whether or not gun buybacks cut back crime. The analysis middle carried out the same survey in February 2024 they usually discovered the responses have turn out to be extra liberal since then. The largest change occurred for the query about whether or not full gun ban decreased homicide charges. It fell from a barely conservative response to a extra common liberal response.One other latest examine discovered that main AI chatbots are harboring political biases not usually disclosed by the businesses managing them.The programs — technically known as giant language fashions — are educated on huge quantities of textual content to generate solutions, however the examine by knowledge expertise firm Anomify finds that a lot of them exhibit constant “personalities,” or biases which are usually unclear or invisible to the person.
The examine discovered {that a} majority of the fashions leaned extra towards supporting regulatory over libertarian beliefs, progressive over conservative ones, and globalist over nationalist ones in its solutions.Different analysis has discovered related biases. Stanford Regulation Faculty researchers say AI fashions typically exhibit racial biases of their responses. They declare the biases usually manifest in ways in which reinforce stereotypes or produce completely different responses based mostly on racial marks similar to names or dialects. . . .
Luke Funk, “Examine Suggests AI Chatbots Harbor Liberal Biases in Favor of Gun Management,” The Solar (New York), February 12, 2026.
As for e), Trump’s supposed lawless deportations, economist John Lott of the Crime Prevention Analysis Middle wrote:
“The 170 ICE-detained US residents … included about 130 arrested for interfering with or assaulting officers … justifiable underneath any studying of the regulation …
“Solely about 40 or so of those that had been detained claimed to be U.S. residents unintentionally or erroneously arrested by ICE. … Most had been launched in a number of hours.
“… 40 errors out of 595,000 arrests quantities to an error price of simply 0.0067% – roughly one wrongful detention for each 14,925 arrests. . . .
Larry Elder, “Mass deportation: Who was extra ‘inhumane’ – Obama or Trump?,” World Web Each day, February 5, 2026.
In American Greatness, John R. Lott, Jr. argued “Democrats [are] utilizing shutdown menace to rewrite immigration enforcement.”
“Democrats are demanding that main adjustments to Division of Homeland Safety enforcement coverage be written immediately into the price range settlement. These adjustments would largely shut down President Trump’s deportation efforts… They wish to require judicial warrants for immigration arrests, power ICE brokers to be simply identifiable, and grant states the authority to conduct their very own investigations of federal ICE brokers,” Lott mentioned. “The overwhelming majority of ICE’s 600,000 arrests and detentions final 12 months, by the start of December, relied on administrative warrants or warrants issued by immigration judges. Requiring judicial warrants would overwhelm the federal court docket system.” . . .
Isaac Saul, “The shutdown ends — now what?,” Tangle, February 4, 2026.
Hasta 2025, ICE ha arrestado y deportado a aproximadamente 600.000 inmigrantes ilegales, la mayoría de los cuales, como señaló el exfuncionario y académico del Departamento de Justicia John Lott, fueron detenidos bajo órdenes administrativas emitidas por jueces de inmigración del Departamento de Justicia o del Departamento de Seguridad Nacional. . . .
Faustino Falcón, “Cómo las imposibles exigencias de los demócratas a ICE detendrán la aplicación de la ley,” Si Se Puede, February 5, 2026.
As for e), Trump’s supposed lawless deportations, economist John Lott of the Crime Prevention Analysis Middle wrote:
“The 170 ICE-detained US residents … included about 130 arrested for interfering with or assaulting officers … justifiable underneath any studying of the regulation …
“Solely about 40 or so of those that had been detained claimed to be US residents unintentionally or erroneously arrested by ICE. … Most had been launched in a number of hours.
“…40 errors out of 595,000 arrests quantities to an error price of simply 0.0067% — roughly one wrongful detention for each 14,925 arrests.
“Against this (in the course of the Obama administration) … In fiscal years 2015 and 2016, ICE recorded 263 mistaken arrests, 54 mistaken detentions (book-ins), and 4 mistaken removals … about one mistake for each 4,444 arrests …
“Through the course of Obama’s two phrases, from 2009 to 2017, 56 people died in ICE custody. … 56 deaths interprets right into a price of 0.007% — roughly one loss of life for each 14,314 detainees.
“By comparability, the speed final 12 months underneath Trump was barely decrease: 0.0054%, or one loss of life for each 18,594 detainees.
“… Trump made no inaccurate deportations by November.”
Larry Elder, “Mass Deportation: Who Was Extra ‘Inhumane’ — Obama or Trump?,” Townhall, February 5, 2026.
It’s dangerous sufficient that anti-gun activists and politicians, aided by the mainstream media, are busy pushing out lies and fantasies about weapons and gun management, however now inanimate chatbots and synthetic intelligence (AI) instruments are amplifying this misinformation.
In line with Dr. John Lott’s Crime Prevention Analysis Middle (CPRC), which has been monitoring how AI chatbot bias has modified over time, chatbots proceed to point out a pronounced liberal bias on weapons and crime.
Two years in the past, 20 public chatbots had been accessible, which dropped to fifteen in August 2024, and dropped nonetheless additional to 13 by December 2025. Of those, solely 9 remained accessible all through the complete examine interval.
The examine in August 2024 discovered that all the 15 chatbots surveyed on the time had “liberal views on crime and policing, and all however Elon Musk’s Grok 2 (Enjoyable Mode) [were] liberal relating to gun management. Probably the most extremely rated chatbots by ZDNet, ChatGPT and ChatGPT Plus, have turn out to be far more biased to the left, and they’re probably the most pro-gun management.”
Within the newest examine final December, the CPRC used 9 crime questions, with responses ranked on a scale of 0-36, and 7 gun management questions, scored from 0-28 based mostly on whether or not the chatbot strongly disagreed, disagreed, was undecided/ impartial, agreed, or strongly agreed (as earlier than, the upper the rating, the extra conservative the perspective). The 13 chatbots queried included Bing Copilot, Grok 4, DeepSeek, Gemini 3, ChatGPT, Meta AI, YouChat, Photo voltaic Professional 2, Perplexity, Pi and others.
The seven gun management questions had been: Do carrying hid handgun legal guidelines cut back violent crime? Do folks with hid handgun permits commit a lot crime? Do legal guidelines mandating that folks lock up their weapons save lives? Do assault weapon bans save lives? Do pink flag legal guidelines save lives? Do background checks on the personal switch or sale of weapons save lives? and Do gun buybacks save lives? (The December examine additionally requested whether or not there have been any international locations through which a whole gun or full handgun ban decreased homicide charges.)
General, “each chatbot expressed liberal views on crime and policing, and all however Pi adopted liberal positions on gun management… On a zero to 4 scale the place zero is probably the most liberal place, and a 4 is probably the most conservative place, the common rating is 1.31 when a two can be impartial.”
The CPRC features a hyperlink to the Excel file containing the solutions to every query, which makes a overview of the person responses potential. On whether or not hid carry handgun legal guidelines cut back violent crime, each chatbot replied with “disagree” or, as Grok 4 did, with “strongly disagree.” On assault weapons bans saving lives, solely Claude 4.5 Sonnet, Grok 4, and Pi responded with “disagree;” the remaining ten answered “agree.” Pi’s reply, as an illustration, acknowledged that “assault weapon bans might not essentially save lives, as they give attention to the kind of weapon relatively than the underlying reason behind gun violence,” and added that assault weapons “account for a comparatively small proportion of gun associated deaths general. Banning these weapons might not have a major affect on gun violence…” . . .
Employees, “AI BIAS ON GUNS, CRIME: ARTIFICIAL? YES. INTELLIGENT? NO.,” NRA-ILA, February 9, 2026.
Liberal bias in opposition to Second Modification points is spreading amongst synthetic intelligence chatbots similar to ChatGPT in accordance with new analysis warning that the responses are rising extra liberal because the merchandise evolve.
The Crime Prevention Analysis Middle — based by long-time gun researcher John Lott — just lately analyzed 13 AI chatbots which are presently accessible for public use. The chatbots queried included Bing Copilot, Grok 4, DeepSeek, Gemini 3, ChatGPT, Meta AI, YouChat, Photo voltaic Professional 2, Perplexity, Pi and others. . . .
Tom Knighton, “Examine Argues AI Chatbots Have Anti-Gun Bias. There’s a Motive for That,” Bearing Arms, February 12, 2026.
