David Braue, Editor-At-Giant for Cybercrime Journal, joined host Scott Schober in a currentĀ episode on the Cybercrime Journal Podcast to debate Australiaās world-first teen social media ban, which went into impact Dec. 10, 2025. Collectively, they focus on how the ban is sitting with teenagers and oldsters throughout the nation, the brand new guidelines platforms, together with TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat, should observe, and extra.
āCritics will say the social media ban is a toothless tiger as a result of teenagers are capable of simply circumvent the social media ban by scanning their mumās or dadās face,ā Braue, a Melbourne, Australia-based award-winning know-how journalist,Ā posted on LinkedIn.
āHowever simply take into consideration this for a second: now, to get onto social media, TEENS HAVE TO SCAN THEIR MUMāS OR DADāS FACE, which suggests stated mum or dad not less than is aware of their youngster desires to get on-line and might begin conversations about what their youngster is doing and how one can take care of what they’re prone to discover there,ā provides Braue.
āThese mother and father may even have the ability to know precisely which websites their youngsters are on, and have some confidence their youngsters arenāt stumbling round within the Internetās darkish corners with none oversight. Given what number of mother and father don’t know what their youngsters are doing on-line, even that may be a win for the brand new legal guidelines as a result of it lets mother and father truly mum or dad their youngsters.ā
To place it one other manner, possibly whatās actually taking place in Australia is that oldsters are pentesting their youngsters. And possibly we must be too?
Take heed to the Podcast Episode








![Internship OpportunityĀ at AGISS Research Institute [August 2024; Online; No Stipend]: Apply by August 9!](https://i2.wp.com/www.lawctopus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Internship-Opportunity-at-AGISS-Research-Institute-July-2024.jpg?w=120&resize=120,86&ssl=1)









