The Council of Europe and Russia Relationship: A view from Russian Civil Society

After the Interstellar film got here out a meme began circulating amongst Russian human rights legal professionals. Depicting protagonists on a faraway planet the image had a caption saying, “One hour on this planet is seven years on Earth. Excellent place to attend for a judgment of the European Court docket of Human Rights”. As I write this weblog the ink has barely dried on a judgment condemning Russia for violations of the liberty of expression on account of the appliance of anti-extremist laws going again to 2007 and on a communication regarding property rights in Russia-controlled Georgian Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia, additionally courting again to 2007.

That is how the cooperation of the Russian civil society with the Council of Europe appeared like: specializing in the Court docket, we by no means traveled that far, however at the price of Strasbourg motion coming too late to be significant. This weblog can’t inform the entire story, particularly concerning the work on the grassroot stage, however it would focus on Russian civil society’s engagement with the Council’s our bodies. Whereas the success earlier than the Strasbourg Court docket was plain, it was nearly all the time belated, while the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Meeting most well-liked to be deaf to warnings and to take heed to the Authorities on a regular basis previous to 2022, and the Commissioner, even when sometimes efficient, was powerless. I’ll take a look at a few of these tales in flip.

European Court docket of Human Rights: main victories that will nonetheless assist others

Traditionally, the Soviet dissident motion advanced across the concept of particular person rights that the State has to abide by, as soon as an endeavor has been taken. Following the calls for of Aleksandr Yesenin-Volpin, mathematic logician and the founding theoretician of the Soviet human rights motion, for the “respect [of] the Soviet Structure” in 1965, the Helsinki Accords in 1975 that gave rise to a world motion and lesser-known post-1977 group monitoring USSR’s compliance with the ICCPR led by Petr Grigorenko (retired battle basic and a distinguished dissident, often called Petro Hryhorenko in Ukrainian), it was solely pure that Russian civil society turned to the European Conference on Human Rights and its supervision mechanism in Strasbourg.

Right here a dimension I wish to stress, for it’s not introduced out within the e-book, is that the successes have been essential and never solely to the Russians themselves, however to the event of the Conference regulation usually. Issues differ from the best to life within the armed battle on the premise of purposes introduced from the North Caucasus by Memorial, Stichting Russia Justice Initiative and Committee towards Torture, to police torture (Committee towards Torture), to the equity of prison proceedings (Centre de la safety internationale, Agora), to covert surveillance (Memorial), to violence towards girls (SRJI, Consortium of Ladies NGOs, and others), to LGBT rights (Dmitry Bartenev), to freedom of press (Mass Media Defence Middle), to web-site blocking (Agora). The now 20 year-old Fadeyeva v Russia continues to be cited throughout the globe in environmental and local weather litigation. Virtually on her personal (with the assistance of a handful of legal professionals) the late Elena Ryabinina created the Court docket’s extradition case-law. If one peruses the Wong Ho Wing v Peru judgment of the Inter-American Court docket of Human Rights regarding extradition to China, the entire Russian ECHR circumstances cited by the judges of San José are these litigated below the supervision of Elena.

Execution of judgments: doing the Committee of Ministers’ work on our personal

The main target of the e-book round which this symposium takes place is, nonetheless, not on the Court docket, however on the Council of Europe our bodies usually. Of these, the Committee of Ministers has been the most important recipient of mail from Russia. That is, in fact, due to its position as a supervisor of the execution of the Court docket’s judgments. To keep away from going again to the Court docket-related points, solely two temporary tales will probably be advised.

What’s now the bread and butter of the European NGOs doing advocacy work, the European Implementation Community particularly, was nearly single-handedly invented and examined round 2010 by Grigor Avetisyan of SRJI. He began following up common Rule 9 submissions on the execution of the Court docket’s Chechen judgments with common advocacy visits assembly particular person States’ delegations to the Council, briefing Ministers’ Deputies and the Committee’s secretariat. In 2010s the Committee was reluctant to take any significant motion past accepting the whole lot the Russian Authorities mentioned at face worth, however even minor enhancements in entry to home investigation recordsdata was proof for the entire Continent that Grigor’s method could bear fruit.

The Committee was a bystander even to a profitable execution of the Court docket’s judgments. In 2017 two Memorial organisations made a Rule 9 submission on the problem of indefinite detention of stateless individuals pending expulsion that was by no means to happen as no nation would settle for them. Anna Pushkarskaya, of Kommersant, then a number one enterprise every day, was shopping the Committee’s web-site and got here throughout the submissions. She referred to as Memorial and shortly made a narrative half the third web page of Kommersant. Having learn the newspaper, the Constitutional Court docket found that there was a case difficult the laws permitting for indefinite detention of stateless individuals in its docket, promptly scheduled it for listening to and struck the impugned norms down. Solely then the Committee’s secretariat referred to as to ask to separate Article 5 and Article 3 points within the submission — one thing was not mandatory.

And sure, it was the identical Constitutional Court docket that had upheld the anti-extremist laws, all types of unchecked covert surveillance, “international brokers’ regulation”, annexation of Crimea, denied rights to LGBT folks, clashed with Strasbourg over its pretended proper to breach the Conference because it happy and so forth. (little or no of this may be discovered within the e-book which barely cites Russian courtroom rulings apart from just a few most infamous judgments from the Constitutional Court docket). The purpose right here will not be that judgments resembling Mskhiladze on the indefinite detention of stateless individuals or Sakova and Balukova and Chernigina on violence towards girls someway rehabilitate or embellish the Constitutional Court docket or legitimise its cannibalistic judgments on different issues. The purpose is that the joint efforts of NGOs, journalists, legal professionals may convey outcomes even in such antagonistic circumstances. The outcomes would have most likely been much more spectacular ought to these in command of worldwide oversight acted quite than stood by.

PACE: between making a tribunal and appeasement of the Russian Authorities

As a result of, because the e-book explains intimately, for the issues outdoors the execution of the Court docket’s judgments the Committee supplied even much less significant interplay, while common interplay occurred with the PACE. Recall that when the Russian delegation to PACE was first disadvantaged of the best to vote within the wake of the Second Chechen Struggle and referred to as, following a 2003 report by Rudolf Bindig, for an institution of an advert hoc tribunal, the Committee of Ministers took no motion within the face of human rights violations demonstrably constituting battle crimes and crimes towards humanity. In such circumstances, that’s the failure of the CoE’s political management, the Court docket grew to become the final hope, and the final resort for victims of great human rights violations.

One of many crucial factors within the relations of Russian civil society with the PACE, because the e-book rightly notes, got here in 2019. The Meeting was making ready to elevate sanctions on the Russian delegation (launched after the occupation of Crimea and elements of Japanese Ukraine in 2014) in change of the reimbursement of 60M euros of Russia’s excellent contributions to the Council. The Russian Authorities efficiently blackmailed the Council with the risk that if its rights of illustration within the Committee of Ministers have been suspended, as ought to have occurred after two years of non-payment of contributions, it could withdraw from the Conference and deprive these below its jurisdiction of the best to complain to the Strasbourg Court docket.

The e-book tells the story of the certainly regrettable and maladroit joint assertion of Russian human rights defenders who basically endorsed the declare to return the Russian MPs’ proper to vote or Russians will probably be disadvantaged of the best of particular person petition. The e-book, presenting the Russian civil society as an indivisible entire (because it additionally does with the Council of Europe’s our bodies or with the Russian Authorities), omits to say the opposite, powerfully dissenting voices crucial of the appeasement. Memorial strongly opposed the joint assertion, Pavel Chikov, of now dissolved and prohibited Agora, took crucial stance in a Mediazona interview, no assist got here from Committee towards Torture or SRJI — all intensively engaged in litigation and advocacy on the European and worldwide stage. Individually, I authored an op-ed in a number one enterprise every day criticising the PACE’s intention to offer in to blackmail and to give up the Council’s values for nothing, betraying the sufferer that was Ukraine. Between 2019 and early 2022 successive PACE delegations visited Russia and ticked the “met with NGOs” field: their solely distinction from the Duma deputies of “United Russia” was that they spoke English.

Commissioner for Human Rights may save lives

The Commissioner for Human Rights was the obvious contact level for the Russian NGOs and particular person human rights defenders participating with the Council. The Commissioner’s voice, nonetheless firmly based mostly on the details and their evaluation, has hardly been heard throughout the organisation. But, even on one’s personal the Commissioner may sometimes save lives. In 2005, when enforced disappearances in Chechnya nonetheless have been commonplace, the then Commissioner Alvaro Gil-Robles introduced collectively NGOs and regional law-enforcement to debate the matter (already again then direct communication was unimaginable). In the course of the convention within the North-Caucasus mineral water resort of Kislovodsk information of yet one more disappearance reached Natalya Estemirova, of the Grozny workplace of Memorial (assassinated for her work in 2009), and Svetlana Gannushkina, of the Civil Help Committee (declared “international brokers” for his or her work). They instantly raised the case with Mr Gil-Robles and the then Chechen Minister of Inside. Because of this intervention the kidnapped individual was fortunately launched.

* * *

This weblog is much from depicting the entire story of the Russian civil society’s engagement with the Council. Neither can it’s discovered within the e-book largely centered across the paperwork discovered on the Council’s web-site (first supply in Russian, an MFA communiqué, is talked about on web page 166) and English-language scholarship to the purpose that solely a dozen of Russians not affiliated with the Authorities is talked about therein, if and provided that they wrote in English (full disclosure: I’m a type of handful). Any debate inside Russian civil society and its debates with the Authorities are absent completely, leaving the reader wonder if there have been people and teams defending and bringing to the bottom the values of the Council of Europe’s founding paperwork.

What’s essential, nonetheless, will not be the late lip service to the braveness of the Russian human rights defenders, really easy to pronounce from the consolation of the Palais de l’Europe. Quite, drawing classes from the Russian expertise means taking motion in order that human rights defenders and opposition politicians within the Council of Europe remaining members wouldn’t be despatched to jail for his or her work, as is presently the case in Azerbaijan and Turkey, the state of affairs in Georgia additionally worsening nearly by day.