Pakistani safety knowledgeable Imtiaz Gul has triggered a significant controversy along with his declare that the Nur Khan airbase in Rawalpindi is successfully below American management.
In a broadly circulated video, Gul alleges that even senior Pakistan Military officers aren’t permitted to intrude within the operations of this strategically very important airbase, suggesting the existence of deep-rooted and undisclosed operational agreements between the US and Pakistan.
Gul’s assertion is especially important given the airbase’s location—simply 10 kilometers from Islamabad and adjoining to Rawalpindi, the headquarters of the Pakistan Military. The bottom can be near the Strategic Plans Division, which oversees Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, additional amplifying issues about nationwide sovereignty and safety.
The Nur Khan airbase homes Pakistan’s predominant air transport squadrons, together with C-130 Hercules and IL-78 mid-air refuelers, and serves because the command centre for air mobility operations. It additionally accommodates key coaching establishments reminiscent of PAF Faculty Chaklala and Fazaia Inter Faculty Nur Khan.
Flight monitoring information and unique satellite tv for pc imagery reviewed by India At this time’s Open-Supply Investigation (OSINT) group recommend {that a} VVIP plane matching the outline utilized by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif was current on the Nur Khan airbase across the time of the Indian Air Drive (IAF) strikes on Might 10, highlighting the strategic sensitivity and vulnerability of the nation’s most essential airbase, India At this time had reported.
In accordance with Gul, American plane are often seen on the base, however there may be little transparency concerning their operations or cargo. He means that the association between the US and Pakistan relies on undisclosed agreements, elevating critical questions concerning the extent of US army entry and the transparency of Pakistan’s army operations.
Gul’s claims have fuelled hypothesis about secretive joint operations or particular entry rights granted to the US, which, if true, would signify a big compromise of Pakistan’s sovereignty.
The controversy comes within the wake of India’s precision strike on the Nur Khan airbase throughout Operation Sindoor, which was a retaliatory response to the Pahalgam terror assault. The strike induced substantial harm to the airbase, highlighting its strategic and symbolic significance within the area.
The proximity of the bottom to Pakistan Military’s predominant command centres and the Strategic Plans Division underscores the gravity of Gul’s allegations and the potential implications for Pakistan’s safety structure.
Regardless of the widespread debate and concern sparked by Gul’s statements, there was no official affirmation or denial from the Pakistani authorities or army concerning the declare of US management over the Nur Khan airbase. The dearth of official response has solely intensified public scrutiny and raised additional questions concerning the nature of US-Pakistan army cooperation and the transparency of such preparations.
Imtiaz Gul’s claims have ignited a nationwide debate over overseas affect, army transparency, and sovereignty at one in all Pakistan’s most delicate army installations. The scenario stays unresolved, with the Pakistani public and strategic group awaiting an official clarification on the true standing of the Nur Khan airbase.
Based mostly On ET Information Report
